A common control framework (CCF) is a unified set of security and privacy controls that maps to multiple regulatory standards simultaneously, allowing organizations to implement a control once and satisfy requirements across many frameworks. Rather than managing separate control sets for each regulation, a CCF provides a single source of truth for your compliance program.

If your organization is subject to more than one cybersecurity or privacy regulation, you have almost certainly experienced the same problem: overlapping requirements, duplicated documentation, redundant assessments, and a growing sense that you are doing the same work multiple times for different audiences. This problem has a name in the industry. It is called framework fatigue, and it is one of the most significant sources of inefficiency in modern compliance programs.

A common control framework is the structural solution to this problem. It provides a single, unified set of controls that maps to multiple regulatory frameworks, standards, and best practices simultaneously. Instead of managing compliance for each framework independently, you implement one set of controls and trace their compliance status across every applicable requirement.

The Problem: Framework Overlap and Duplication

Consider a mid-size technology company that handles healthcare data, serves European customers, and pursues SOC 2 reports for enterprise sales. That company might be subject to HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and possibly ISO 27001 if customers or partners require certification. If the company works with the US federal government, add NIST 800-171 or CMMC to the list.

Each of these frameworks requires controls for access management. Each requires incident response procedures. Each requires encryption of data at rest and in transit. Each requires risk assessments. Each requires employee security awareness training. The specific language varies, the control numbering differs, and the audit evidence formats may not be identical, but the underlying security outcomes are substantially the same.

Without a unifying structure, the compliance team ends up maintaining separate documentation for each framework, conducting separate assessments against each control set, and producing separate evidence packages for each auditor. The work scales linearly with each new framework added, which is unsustainable for any organization that does not have an unlimited compliance budget.

The numbers illustrate the scale of the problem. NIST 800-53 revision 5 contains over 1,000 controls. ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls in Annex A. SOC 2 has 60+ trust services criteria. HIPAA has 75 administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. CMMC Level 2 has 110 practices. When you add them all up, you are looking at over 1,300 individual requirements, but the number of truly unique security outcomes they describe is far smaller. The overlap between frameworks is typically 40-70% depending on which frameworks you are comparing.

What a Common Control Framework Does

A common control framework consolidates those overlapping requirements into a single control set. Each control in the unified set is mapped to every framework requirement it satisfies. When you implement that control and collect evidence of its implementation, that evidence simultaneously demonstrates compliance with every mapped requirement across every applicable framework.

The key attributes of an effective common control framework are:

Comprehensive coverage. It must cover the full scope of controls across all major cybersecurity and privacy frameworks, not just the common subset. Controls that are unique to a single framework still need to be included.

Authoritative mappings. The crosswalks between the unified controls and the source frameworks must be accurate, maintained, and defensible. Poor-quality mappings undermine the entire value proposition.

Granularity. The unified controls must be specific enough to be actionable. A control that says “implement access management” is too vague. A control that specifies “enforce multi-factor authentication for privileged access to production systems” is specific enough to implement, test, and audit.

Ongoing maintenance. Regulations and standards are updated regularly. A common control framework must track those changes and update its mappings accordingly, or it becomes stale and unreliable.

Several organizations have developed common control frameworks, including HITRUST CSF (focused on healthcare), the Unified Compliance Framework (UCF), and COBIT (focused on IT governance). The Secure Controls Framework distinguishes itself through its breadth — mapping over 200 statutory, regulatory, and contractual frameworks — and its open availability, with no licensing fees to access the core control set.

The Secure Controls Framework as a Meta-Framework

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is the most comprehensive common control framework available today. It maps over 200 regulatory frameworks, standards, and best practices to a single unified control set. The SCF is maintained by an independent organization and is available as an open resource, making it accessible to organizations of all sizes.

The SCF’s control catalog covers the full breadth of cybersecurity and privacy domains, organized into control families that address areas such as asset management, access control, cryptographic protections, data classification, endpoint security, incident response, network security, physical security, privacy, risk management, security operations, supply chain risk management, and vulnerability management.

Each SCF control includes mappings to the specific requirements it satisfies across frameworks like NIST CSF, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CMMC, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, CCPA, and dozens more. When a framework is updated, as NIST CSF was when it moved from version 1.1 to 2.0, the SCF updates its mappings to reflect the changes.

The practical effect is that you can browse the SCF controls catalog and see, for any given control, exactly which framework requirements it addresses. This transparency enables informed decision-making about which controls to prioritize based on your specific regulatory landscape.

Benefits of a Unified Approach

Adopting a common control framework delivers measurable benefits across several dimensions.

Reduced compliance effort. The most immediate benefit is efficiency. Instead of implementing and documenting the same control three or four times under different framework labels, you implement it once. For a company subject to five frameworks, this can reduce compliance workload by 50% or more depending on the degree of overlap.

Consistent evidence collection. When a single control satisfies requirements across multiple frameworks, you collect one set of evidence. That evidence is reusable across audits, which reduces preparation time and ensures consistency. An auditor reviewing your access control implementation for SOC 2 sees the same control and evidence that an assessor reviewing CMMC compliance would see.

Better security coverage. By consolidating controls into a unified view, you can more easily identify gaps. If your organization has implemented 90% of the controls mapped to ISO 27001 but only 70% of those mapped to HIPAA, a common control framework makes that gap visible immediately. Without it, gaps can hide in the complexity of managing multiple separate control sets.

Simplified communication. A common control framework gives your organization a single language for discussing security and compliance. Engineers, auditors, legal teams, and executives can all reference the same controls and understand how they relate to specific regulatory obligations.

Faster framework adoption. When a new regulation applies to your organization, you do not start from scratch. You map the new framework’s requirements to your existing unified controls, identify the gaps, and focus remediation only on the controls you do not already have in place. This turns what used to be a multi-month project into a gap analysis exercise.

From Framework to Platform: How SCF Connect Operationalizes the SCF

The SCF as a spreadsheet or reference document is valuable but limited. To realize the full benefits of a common control framework, organizations need tooling that makes the mappings actionable, the assessments structured, and the evidence traceable.

SCF Connect is built specifically for this purpose. It takes the SCF’s comprehensive control catalog and framework mappings and turns them into a compliance management platform where you can:

  • Select your applicable frameworks and instantly see the unified set of controls you need to implement. Whether you are managing NIST 800-171, SOC 2, or a combination of ten frameworks, the platform de-duplicates the requirements and presents a single compliance workload.
  • Assess your controls against maturity levels using the SP-CMM model, attach evidence, assign ownership, and track status across your organization.
  • Visualize your compliance posture across every applicable framework simultaneously through dashboards that show where you stand, where the gaps are, and how remediation efforts affect your compliance percentage.
  • Generate audit-ready reports scoped to the specific framework an auditor or customer is asking about, drawn from the same underlying control data.

The result is that adding a new framework to your compliance obligations becomes an incremental exercise rather than a new project. Your existing controls and evidence carry forward, and you focus only on the delta.

Getting Started

If you are managing compliance across multiple frameworks today and feeling the weight of duplicated effort, the path forward starts with understanding what GRC looks like when it is built on a unified control framework rather than siloed programs.

Evaluate your current framework landscape, identify the overlap, and consider how a common control framework can consolidate that workload. The SCF provides the mappings. SCF Connect provides the platform to put them into practice.

Start your free trial to see how SCF Connect unifies your compliance obligations into a single, manageable program.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a common control framework?

A common control framework is a unified control set designed to address overlapping requirements across multiple regulatory standards and industry frameworks. Instead of maintaining separate compliance programs for each regulation, organizations implement one set of controls that satisfies many frameworks simultaneously — reducing duplication, cost, and audit fatigue.

How is the SCF different from NIST 800-53?

NIST 800-53 is a comprehensive security and privacy control catalog developed by the US government, primarily for federal systems. The Secure Controls Framework is a meta-framework that maps NIST 800-53 controls alongside 200+ other frameworks into a single taxonomy. Think of NIST 800-53 as one important input to the SCF, which then connects it to ISO 27001, SOC 2, CMMC, GDPR, and many more.

What frameworks does the SCF map to?

The SCF maps to over 200 statutory, regulatory, and contractual frameworks, including NIST CSF 2.0, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, CMMC, GDPR, FedRAMP, PCI DSS, CCPA, SOX, COBIT, and many more. The full list is maintained by the Secure Controls Framework Council.

Is the SCF free to use?

Yes. The Secure Controls Framework is available at no cost for any organization to download and use. SCF Connect is the commercial platform that operationalizes the SCF, providing tools to manage controls, track compliance status, generate evidence, and run maturity assessments across all mapped frameworks.

Related resources: