Skip to main content

AST-03.1: Accountability Information

AST 5 — Medium Identify

Mechanisms exist to include capturing the name, position and/or role of individuals responsible/accountable for administering assets as part of the technology asset inventory process.

Control Question: Does the organization include capturing the name, position and/or role of individuals responsible/accountable for administering assets as part of the technology asset inventory process?

General (16)
Framework Mapping Values
COBIT 2019 EDM05.01 EDM05.02 EDM05.03 APO01.06
GovRAMP High CM-08(04)
ISO 27002 2022 5.9
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 ID.IM-P2
NIST 800-53 R4 CM-8(4)
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) CM-8(4)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) CM-8(4)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) CM-8(4)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay CM-8(4)
NIST 800-161 R1 CM-8(4)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 CM-8(4)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.09.02.a.03
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) ID.AM
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational AST-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure AST-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats AST-03.1
US (7)
Framework Mapping Values
US CERT RMM 1.2 ADM:SG1.SP3
US FedRAMP R4 CM-8(4)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) CM-8(4)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) CM-8(4)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) CM-8(4)
US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) 164.310(d)(2)(iii)
US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) 164.310(d)(2)(iii)
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.09.02.A.03

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to include capturing the name, position and/ or role of individuals responsible/accountable for administering assets as part of the technology asset inventory process.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to include capturing the name, position and/ or role of individuals responsible/accountable for administering assets as part of the technology asset inventory process.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Technology assets are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
  • Inventories cover technology assets in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
  • Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
  • Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect technology assets assigned to them or under their supervision.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
  • An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
  • Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
  • A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
  • Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
  • Stakeholders leverage ITAM tools to create and maintain an inventory of systems, applications and services, that need to adhere to statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual requirements, with sufficient detail to determine control applicability.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to include capturing the name, position and/ or role of individuals responsible/accountable for administering assets as part of the technology asset inventory process.

Assessment Objectives

  1. AST-03.1_A01 individuals responsible and accountable for administering system components are identified by organization-defined criteria in the system component inventory.

Evidence Requirements

E-AST-01 IT Asset Management (ITAM)

Documented evidence of an IT Asset Management (ITAM) program that addresses the due diligence and due care activities associated with maintaining both secure and compliant systems, applications and services.

Asset Management

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Small

  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Medium

  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Large

  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

Enterprise

  • IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
  • Configuration Management Database (CMDB)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.