AST-10: Return of Assets
Mechanisms exist to ensure that employees and third-party users return all organizational assets in their possession upon termination of employment, contract or agreement.
Control Question: Does the organization ensure that employees and third-party users return all organizational assets in their possession upon termination of employment, contract or agreement?
General (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC6.4-POF3 |
| CSA CCM 4 | HRS-05 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.11 |
| ISO 27017 2015 | 8.1.4 CLD.8.1.5 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.09.02.a.03 |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.09.02.a.03 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | AST-10 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | AST-10 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | AST-10 |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | AM-04 AM-05 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 11.12 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 8.1.4 8.1.5.P |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.09.02.A.03 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to ensure that employees and third-party users return all organizational assets in their possession up on termination of employment, contract or agreement.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Asset Management (AST) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is informally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Asset inventories are performed in an ad hoc manner.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Data process owners maintain limited network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data that is specific to their initiative.
- IT personnel work with data/process owners to help ensure secure practices are implemented throughout the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
- Supervisors for users leaving the company collect assets and return those assets to IT personnel.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Technology assets are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
- Inventories cover technology assets in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect technology assets assigned to them or under their supervision.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
- Supervisors for users leaving the company should collect assets and return the assets to IT personnel.
- Assets not returned are reported as a security incident, based on the data that may exist on the device(s).
- Devices are escrowed in storage for a period of time before being wiped and reissued, in case data on the devices are needed for investigations or business purposes.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
- An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
- Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
- A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
- Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
- Supervisors for users leaving the company should collect assets and return the assets to IT personnel.
- Assets not returned by users leaving the organization are reported as a security incident, based on the data that may exist on the device(s).
- Devices are escrowed in storage for a period of time before being wiped and reissued, in case data on the devices are needed for investigations or business purposes.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure that employees and third-party users return all organizational assets in their possession up on termination of employment, contract or agreement.
Assessment Objectives
- AST-10_A01 the organization governs a process to ensure that employees return all organizational assets in their possession upon termination of employment.
- AST-10_A02 the organization governs a process to ensure that third-party users return all organizational assets in their possession upon termination of contract or agreement.
- AST-10_A03 upon termination of individual employment, security-related system property is retrieved.
Evidence Requirements
- E-AST-01 IT Asset Management (ITAM)
-
Documented evidence of an IT Asset Management (ITAM) program that addresses the due diligence and due care activities associated with maintaining both secure and compliant systems, applications and services.
Asset Management
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
Medium
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
Large
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
Enterprise
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program