Skip to main content

AST-14: Usage Parameters

AST 7 — High Identify

Mechanisms exist to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.

Control Question: Does the organization monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters?

General (9)
Framework Mapping Values
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1114.003, T1613
NIST 800-53 R4 SC-43
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SC-43
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SC-43
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.18.a
SWIFT CSF 2023 2.9
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) AST-14
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure AST-14
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats AST-14
US (1)
Framework Mapping Values
US CERT RMM 1.2 TM:SG2.SP2 TM:SG4.SP1
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.18.A

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Technology assets are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
  • Inventories cover technology assets in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
  • Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
  • Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect technology assets assigned to them or under their supervision.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
  • An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
  • Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
  • A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
  • Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Asset Management (AST) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. AST-14_A01 the components for which usage restrictions and implementation guidance are to be established are defined.
  2. AST-14_A02 usage restrictions and implementation guidelines are established for components.
  3. AST-14_A03 the use of components is authorized within the system.
  4. AST-14_A04 the use of components is monitored within the system.
  5. AST-14_A05 the use of components is controlled within the system.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Centralized log collector
  • Manual event log reviews

Small

  • Centralized log collector
  • Manual event log reviews
  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)

Medium

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
  • Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)

Large

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
  • Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)

Enterprise

  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
  • Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.