AST-14: Usage Parameters
Mechanisms exist to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.
Control Question: Does the organization monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters?
General (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| MITRE ATT&CK 10 | T1114.003, T1613 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SC-43 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SC-43 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SC-43 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.01.18.a |
| SWIFT CSF 2023 | 2.9 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | AST-14 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | AST-14 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | AST-14 |
US (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | TM:SG2.SP2 TM:SG4.SP1 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.18.A |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to monitor and enforce usage parameters that limit the potential damage caused from the unauthorized or unintentional alteration of system parameters.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Technology assets are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
- Inventories cover technology assets in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect technology assets assigned to them or under their supervision.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
- An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
- Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
- A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
- Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
Asset Management (AST) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
- Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.
Assessment Objectives
- AST-14_A01 the components for which usage restrictions and implementation guidance are to be established are defined.
- AST-14_A02 usage restrictions and implementation guidelines are established for components.
- AST-14_A03 the use of components is authorized within the system.
- AST-14_A04 the use of components is monitored within the system.
- AST-14_A05 the use of components is controlled within the system.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Centralized log collector
- Manual event log reviews
Small
- Centralized log collector
- Manual event log reviews
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
Medium
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
- Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)
Large
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
- Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)
Enterprise
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
- Netwrix Auditor (https://netrix.com)