AST-29: Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Security
Mechanisms exist to securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces.
Control Question: Does the organization securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces?
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 11.6.59.C.01 11.6.59.C.02 11.6.60.C.01 11.6.60.C.02 11.6.60.C.03 11.6.60.C.04 11.6.61.C.01 11.6.61.C.02 11.6.62.C.01 11.6.62.C.02 11.6.62.C.03 11.6.63.C.01 11.6.63.C.02 11.6.64.C.01 11.6.65.C.01 11.6.65.C.02 11.6.65.C.03 11.6.66.C.01 11.6.67.C.01 11.6.67.C.02 11.6.68.C.01 11.6.69.C.01 11.6.70.C.01 11.6.71.C.01 11.6.72.C.01 11.6.72.C.02 11.6.72.C.03 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Asset Management (AST) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for asset management.
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Asset management is formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- Technology assets are categorized according to data classification and business criticality.
- Inventories cover technology assets in scope for statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance, which includes both physical and virtual assets.
- Software licensing is tracked as part of IT asset inventories.
- Users are educated on their responsibilities to protect technology assets assigned to them or under their supervision.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel maintain network diagrams to document the flow of sensitive/regulated data across the network.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
- An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
- Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
- A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
- Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to securely govern Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) deployments to ensure RFID is used safely and securely to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data and prevent the compromise of secure spaces.
Assessment Objectives
- AST-29_A01 secure baseline configurations exist for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) devices to protect the confidentiality and integrity of data being stored, processed and/or transmitted.
- AST-29_A02 Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) devices are secured according to defined secure baseline configurations.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Small
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Medium
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Large
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
Enterprise
- IT Asset Management (ITAM) program
- Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)