Skip to main content

BCD-11.1: Testing for Reliability & Integrity

BCD 9 — Critical Recover

Mechanisms exist to routinely test backups that verify the reliability of the backup process, as well as the integrity and availability of the data.

Control Question: Does the organization routinely test backups that verify the reliability of the backup process, as well as the integrity and availability of the data?

General (27)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) A1.2 A1.3-POF2 CC7.5
CIS CSC 8.1 11.3 11.5
CIS CSC 8.1 IG1 11.3
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 11.3 11.5
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 11.3 11.5
CSA CCM 4 BCR-06 BCR-08
ENISA 2.0 SO22
GovRAMP Low+ CP-09(01)
GovRAMP Moderate CP-09(01)
GovRAMP High CP-09(01)
IEC 62443-4-2 2019 CR 7.3 (11.5.3(1))
ISO 27002 2022 8.13
ISO 27017 2015 12.3.1
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 PR.DS-P6
NIST 800-53 R4 CP-9(1)
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) CP-9(1)
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) CP-9(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) CP-9(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) CP-9(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) CP-9(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay CP-9(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay CP-9(1)
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) PR.DS-11
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) BCD-11.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational BCD-11.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure BCD-11.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats BCD-11.1
US (12)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 RESPONSE-4.B.MIL1 RESPONSE-4.J.MIL2
US CISA CPG 2022 2.R
US CMS MARS-E 2.0 CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R4 CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R4 (high) CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) CP-9(1)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) CP-9(1)
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-009-6 1.4 CIP-009-6 2.2
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.16(e)
US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 CP-9(1)
EMEA (8)
APAC (6)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1515
APAC India SEBI CSCRF PR.IP.S8
APAC Japan ISMAP 12.3.1
APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 HHSP57 HHSP69 HML57 HML68 HMS11 HSUP49 HSUP60
APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 HSUP49 HSUP60
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 8.4.3

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to routinely test backups that verify the reliability of the backup process, as well as the integrity and availability of the data.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT personnel work with business stakeholders to identify business-critical systems and services, including internal teams and third-party service providers.
  • IT personnel develop limited Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services.
  • Business stakeholders develop limited Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business-critical functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs).
  • Backups are performed ad-hoc and focus on business-critical systems.
  • Limited technologies exist to support near real-time network infrastructure failover (e.g., redundant ISPs, redundant power, etc.).
  • A random sampling of backups is tested at least annually to verify integrity and recoverability of backed up data.
  • Backup media for sensitive/regulated data is encrypted and integrity checked.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for BC/DR management.
  • BC/DR roles are formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) identify business-critical systems and services, which are given priority of service in alternate processing and storage sites.
  • IT personnel develop Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services.
  • Data/process owners conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) at least annually, or after any major technology or process change, to identify assets critical to the business in need of protection, as well as single points of failure.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders to develop Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs).
  • IT personnel use a backup methodology (e.g., grandfather, father & s on rotation) to store backups in a secondary location, separate from the primary storage site.
  • IT personnel configure business-critical systems to transfer backup data to the alternate storage site at a rate that is capable of meeting Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs).
  • IT personnel perform a random sampling of backups is tested at least semi-annually to verify integrity and recoverability of backed up data.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A formal Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) program exists with defined roles and responsibilities to restore functionality in the event of a catastrophe, emergency, or significant disruptive incident that is handled in accordance with a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).
  • BC/DR personnel work with business stakeholders to identify business-critical systems, services, internal teams and third-party service providers.
  • Specific criteria are defined to initiate BC/DR activities that facilitate business continuity operations capable of meeting applicable RTOs and/or RPOs.- Application/system/process owners conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) at least annually, or after any major technology or process change, to identify assets critical to the business in need of protection, as well as single points of failure.
  • Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) are defined for business-critical systems and services.
  • Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) are defined and technologies exist to conduct transaction-level recovery, in accordance with RPOs.
  • Controls are assigned to sensitive/regulated assets to comply with specific BC/DR requirements to facilitate recovery operations in accordance with RTOs and RPOs.
  • IT personnel work with business stakeholders to develop Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services within RPOs.
  • Business stakeholders work with IT personnel to develop Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within RTOs.
  • The data backup function is formally assigned with defined roles and responsibilities.
  • BC/DR personnel have pre-established methods to communicate the status of recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities to designated internal and external stakeholders.
  • The integrity of backups and other restoration assets are verified prior to using them for restoration.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to routinely test backups that verify the reliability of the backup process, as well as the integrity and availability of the data.

Assessment Objectives

  1. BCD-11.1_A01 the frequency at which to test backup information for media reliability is defined.
  2. BCD-11.1_A02 the frequency at which to test backup information for information integrity is defined.
  3. BCD-11.1_A03 backup information is tested frequently to verify media reliability.
  4. BCD-11.1_A04 backup information is tested frequently to verify information integrity.

Evidence Requirements

E-BCM-10 Backups

Documented evidence of a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)-related data backup scheme that demonstrates the methods of data backup (including protection measures) for all data types to ensure business continuity requirements.

Business Continuity

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Randomized data recovery testing

Small

  • Randomized data recovery testing

Medium

  • Randomized data recovery testing

Large

  • Randomized data recovery testing

Enterprise

  • Randomized data recovery testing

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.