Skip to main content

BCD-13.1: Restoration Integrity Verification

BCD 7 — High Govern

Mechanisms exist to verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets prior to using them for restoration.

Control Question: Does the organization verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets prior to using them for restoration?

General (4)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) RC.RP-03
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational BCD-13.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure BCD-13.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats BCD-13.1
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 4.2.3

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets prior to using them for restoration.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT personnel work with business stakeholders to identify business-critical systems and services, including internal teams and third-party service providers.
  • IT personnel develop limited Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services.
  • Business stakeholders develop limited Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business-critical functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs).
  • Backups are performed ad-hoc and focus on business-critical systems.
  • Limited technologies exist to support near real-time network infrastructure failover (e.g., redundant ISPs, redundant power, etc.).
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for BC/DR management.
  • BC/DR roles are formally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
  • Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) identify business-critical systems and services, which are given priority of service in alternate processing and storage sites.
  • IT personnel develop Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services.
  • Data/process owners conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) at least annually, or after any major technology or process change, to identify assets critical to the business in need of protection, as well as single points of failure.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders to develop Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs).
  • IT personnel use a backup methodology (e.g., grandfather, father & s on rotation) to store backups in a secondary location, separate from the primary storage site.
  • IT personnel configure business-critical systems to transfer backup data to the alternate storage site at a rate that is capable of meeting Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs).
  • IT personnel maintain technologies that are compatible with existing network and infrastructure configuration.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A formal Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) program exists with defined roles and responsibilities to restore functionality in the event of a catastrophe, emergency, or significant disruptive incident that is handled in accordance with a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).
  • BC/DR personnel work with business stakeholders to identify business-critical systems, services, internal teams and third-party service providers.
  • Specific criteria are defined to initiate BC/DR activities that facilitate business continuity operations capable of meeting applicable RTOs and/or RPOs.- Application/system/process owners conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) at least annually, or after any major technology or process change, to identify assets critical to the business in need of protection, as well as single points of failure.
  • Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) are defined for business-critical systems and services.
  • Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) are defined and technologies exist to conduct transaction-level recovery, in accordance with RPOs.
  • Controls are assigned to sensitive/regulated assets to comply with specific BC/DR requirements to facilitate recovery operations in accordance with RTOs and RPOs.
  • IT personnel work with business stakeholders to develop Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services within RPOs.
  • Business stakeholders work with IT personnel to develop Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within RTOs.
  • The data backup function is formally assigned with defined roles and responsibilities.
  • BC/DR personnel have pre-established methods to communicate the status of recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities to designated internal and external stakeholders.
  • The integrity of backups and other restoration assets are verified prior to using them for restoration.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets prior to using them for restoration.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets prior to using them for restoration.

Assessment Objectives

  1. BCD-13.1_A01 methods to verify the integrity of backups and other restoration assets are defined.
  2. BCD-13.1_A02 the integrity of backups and other restoration assets is verified, prior to using them for restoration.

Evidence Requirements

E-GOV-10 Cybersecurity & Data Protection Controls

Documented evidence of an appropriately-scoped cybersecurity & data protection controls. Controls are technical, administrative or physical safeguards. Controls are the nexus used to manage risks through preventing, detecting or lessening the ability of a particular threat from negatively impacting business processes. Controls directly map to standards, since control testing is designed to measure specific aspects of how standards are actually implemented.

Cybersecurity & Data Protection Management
E-GOV-11 Cybersecurity & Data Protection Procedures

Documented evidence of an appropriate appropriately-scoped cybersecurity & data protection procedures. Procedures are a documented set of steps necessary to perform a specific task or process in conformance with an applicable standard. Procedures help address the question of how the organization actually operationalizes a policy, standard or control. The result of a procedure is intended to satisfy a specific control. Procedures are also commonly referred to as “control activities.”

Cybersecurity & Data Protection Management

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.