BCD-16: AI & Autonomous Technologies Incidents
Mechanisms exist to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Control Question: Does the organization handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk?
General (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | GOVERN 6.2 |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | R.8 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | BCD-16 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A formal Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) program exists with defined roles and responsibilities to restore functionality in the event of a catastrophe, emergency, or significant disruptive incident that is handled in accordance with a Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP).
- BC/DR personnel work with business stakeholders to identify business-critical systems, services, internal teams and third-party service providers.
- Specific criteria are defined to initiate BC/DR activities that facilitate business continuity operations capable of meeting applicable RTOs and/or RPOs.- Application/system/process owners conduct a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) at least annually, or after any major technology or process change, to identify assets critical to the business in need of protection, as well as single points of failure.
- Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) are defined for business-critical systems and services.
- Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) are defined and technologies exist to conduct transaction-level recovery, in accordance with RPOs.
- Controls are assigned to sensitive/regulated assets to comply with specific BC/DR requirements to facilitate recovery operations in accordance with RTOs and RPOs.
- IT personnel work with business stakeholders to develop Disaster Recovery Plans (DRP) to recover business-critical systems and services within RPOs.
- Business stakeholders work with IT personnel to develop Business Continuity Plans (BCPs) to ensure business functions are sustainable both during and after an incident within RTOs.
- The data backup function is formally assigned with defined roles and responsibilities.
- BC/DR personnel have pre-established methods to communicate the status of recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities to designated internal and external stakeholders.
- The integrity of backups and other restoration assets are verified prior to using them for restoration.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to handle failures or incidents with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Assessment Objectives
- BCD-16_A01 an incident handling capability for incidents involving Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) exists.
- BCD-16_A02 processes are in place to handle failures or incidents in third-party data or Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Autonomous Technologies (AAT) deemed to be high-risk.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Incident Response Plan (IRP)
- Legal review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program
Small
- Incident Response Plan (IRP)
- Legal review
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program
Medium
- Incident Response Plan (IRP)
- Legal review
- Steering committee
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program
Large
- Incident Response Plan (IRP)
- Legal review
- Steering committee
- Board of Directors (BoD)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program
Enterprise
- Incident Response Plan (IRP)
- Legal review
- Steering committee
- Board of Directors (BoD)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) / autonomous technologies governance program