BCD-28: Data Archiving
Mechanisms exist to archive data that is no longer in active use to secure storage, in accordance with applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual retention obligations.
Control Question: Does the organization archive data that is no longer in active use to secure storage, in accordance with applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual retention obligations?
General (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| COBIT 2019 | APO14.09 |
| CSA CCM 4.1.0 | DSP-16 |
| NIST 800-218 | PS.3.1 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.9 | 11.3.13.C.02 13.1.12.C.01 13.1.12.C.03 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control: ▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process. ▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) capabilities are requirements-driven, but are not standardized across the entity (e.g., local/regional level consistency). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist: ▪ Policies and standards associated with BCD domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity. ▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with BCD domain capabilities are documented and maintained by process owners. ▪ IT and/or cybersecurity personnel work with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with BCD domain capabilities to address applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). ▪ Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery (BC/DR)-related controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies, standards and procedures & guidelines). ▪ BC/DR may be a defined function (e.g., team or department) or assigned as an additional duty to existing IT and/or cybersecurity personnel. ▪ Appropriate TAASD exist to conduct full, incremental and/or differential backups (e.g., tape/disk, hybrid cloud or direct-to-cloud). ▪ IT personnel configure business-critical Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services to transfer backup data to the alternate site(s) at a rate that is capable of meeting RTOs and RPOs. ▪ The backup methodology is sufficient to support RTOs and RPOs for critical business functions. ▪ IT personnel store backups in a secondary location, separate from the primary storage site (e.g., cloud-based storage). ▪ IT personnel perform a random sampling of backups is tested at least semi-annually to verify integrity and recoverability of backed up data. ▪ Backups for sensitive/regulated data are cryptographically protected (encrypted and integrity checked) to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and modification of backup information. ▪ IT personnel backup copies of business-critical software, licenses/keys and other security-related information to the alternate site.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BCD) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist: ▪ Policies and standards associated with BCD domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function. ▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with BCD domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners. ▪ A Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain BCD domain capabilities. ▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of BC/DR operations (e.g., BC/DR planning software, Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS), Orchestration and Automation Tools). ▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with BCD domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies. ▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.
Assessment Objectives
- BCD-28_A01 the criteria used to determine when data is no longer in active use and is eligible for archiving are defined.
- BCD-28_A02 applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual retention obligations are identified and documented for each type of archived data.
- BCD-28_A03 data that is no longer in active use is archived to secure storage and retained for the period required by the identified retention obligations.
- BCD-28_A04 archived data is protected from unauthorized access, modification and deletion for the duration of its retention period.
- BCD-28_A05 the retrievability of archived data is tested at a defined frequency and the results are documented.
Evidence Requirements
- E-AST-11 Data Retention Program
-
Documented evidence of a formal data retention program that governs the retention and destruction of data types.
Asset Management
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Documented records retention schedule
- Archived files moved to access-restricted cloud storage
Small
- Records retention schedule
- Cloud archive storage tier (e.g., AWS Glacier, Azure Archive)
- Email archiving (e.g., Microsoft 365 retention policies)
Medium
- Records management program
- Cloud archive storage with retention policies (e.g., AWS Glacier, Azure Archive)
- Email and file archiving with legal hold (e.g., Microsoft Purview)
Large
- Enterprise records management program
- Archiving platform with retention and legal hold (e.g., Microsoft Purview, Veritas Enterprise Vault)
- Periodic archive readability testing
Enterprise
- Enterprise information governance program
- Archiving platform with retention, legal hold and eDiscovery (e.g., Microsoft Purview, Veritas, OpenText)
- Automated retention enforcement and defensible destruction