CFG-06.1: Integrity Assurance & Enforcement (IAE)
Automated mechanisms exist to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change?
General (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 2.3 2.4 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | CM-3(8) CM-11(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | CM-3(8) CM-11(3) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | CM-3(8) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | CM-3(8) |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | CM-3(8) |
| NIST 800-172 | 3.14.7e 3.4.2e |
| NIST 800-207 | NIST Tenet 5 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | CFG-06.1 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) | CM.L3-3.4.2E |
| US DHS ZTCF | APP-02 DIN-01 |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-0843 ISM-0846 ISM-0955 ISM-1392 ISM-1471 ISM-1490 ISM-1544 ISM-1582 |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | PR.DS.S6 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada CSAG | 4.19 4.20 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Configuration Management (CFG) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- The configuration management function is formally assigned with defined roles and responsibilities.
- An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
- Configuration management is centralized for all operating systems, applications, servers and other configurable technologies.
- Technologies are configured to protect data with the strength and integrity commensurate with the classification or sensitivity of the information and conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides), including test, development, staging and production environments.
- Configurations conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides) for test, development, staging and production environments.
- Deviations to baseline configurations are required to have a risk assessment and business process owner approval of the risk(s) associated with the deviation.
- Special baseline configurations are created for higher-risk environments or for systems, applications and services that store, process or transmit sensitive/regulated data.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, ensures compliance with requirements for asset management.
- Logical Access Control (LAC) is used to limit the ability of non-administrators from making configuration changes to systems, applications and services, including the of installation of unauthorized software.
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool, monitors for unauthorized activities, accounts, connections, devices and software.
- Unauthorized configuration changes are responded to in accordance with an Incident Response Plan (IRP) to determine if the unauthorized configuration is malicious in nature.
- Unauthorized configuration changes are immediately reverted to approved configurations.
- Configuration monitoring software monitors, reports on and enforces configurations for endpoint devices.
- An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” practices the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
- ITAM leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets.
- A formal Change Management (CM) program ensures that no unauthorized changes are made, all changes are documented, services are not disrupted and that resources are used efficiently.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to identify unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline and implement automated resiliency actions to remediate the unauthorized change.
Assessment Objectives
- CFG-06.1_A01 unauthorized deviations from an approved baseline are identified and automated resiliency actions are implemented to remediate the unauthorized change.
Technology Recommendations
Medium
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
Large
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)
Enterprise
- CimTrak Integrity Suite (https://cimcor.com/cimtrak)