Skip to main content

CPL-05: Legal Assessment of Investigative Inquires

CPL 2 — Low Respond

Mechanisms exist to determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary.

Control Question: Does the organization determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary?

General (3)
Framework Mapping Values
CSA CCM 4 DSP-18
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) CPL-05
SCF CORE AI Model Deployment CPL-05
US (2)
Framework Mapping Values
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.17(a)(2) 500.2(e)
US - TN TIPA 47-18-3206(c)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU AI Act 21.1 22.3(c) 22.3(d) 24.5 24.6 91.4 91.5 92.4 92.5
EMEA Germany C5 2020 INQ-01
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC China Cybersecurity Law 72
APAC China Privacy Law 41

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Compliance (CPL) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Compliance activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for compliance activities.
  • Cybersecurity personnel use a defined set of controls to conduct cybersecurity and data privacy control assessments, as defined by the applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Compliance (CPL) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures data/process owners understand their requirements to manage applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls through oversight and written guidance. o Provides applicable stakeholders with status reports on control execution to enable security controls oversight. o Works with data/process owners and asset custodians to document and validate the scope of cybersecurity and data protection controls to ensure statutory, regulatory and/ or contractual compliance obligations are met. o Conducts cybersecurity and data privacy control assessments, on a regular cadence that is defined by the applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.

  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to ensure compliance requirements are identified and documented.
  • The GRC function, or similar function:
  • Cybersecurity and data privacy controls are centrally managed through a technology solution (e.g., GRC solution) to assign controls, track control activities and report on compliance efforts.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization and what further steps need to be taken, if necessary.

Assessment Objectives

  1. CPL-05_A01 a formal process exists to intake requests, document the request and determine whether a government agency has an applicable and valid legal basis to request data from the organization.
  2. CPL-05_A02 based on an applicable and valid legal basis for a data request by a government agency, data request fulfillment actions are formally assigned to an individual or group with explicitly-specified criteria to minimize inappropriate data sharing.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Legal review

Small

  • Legal review

Medium

  • Legal review

Large

  • Legal review

Enterprise

  • Legal review

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.