CRY-09.2: Asymmetric Keys
Mechanisms exist to facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key.
Control Question: Does the organization facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key?
General (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC6.1 CC6.1-POF10 CC6.1-POF11 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | SC-12(03) |
| GovRAMP High | SC-12(03) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SC-12(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SC-12(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SC-12(3) |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US FedRAMP R4 | SC-12(3) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | SC-12(3) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | SC-12(3) |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | SC-12(3) |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Cryptographic Protections (CRY) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Cryptographic management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for cryptographic management.
- Data classification and handling criteria govern requirements to encrypt sensitive/regulated data during transmission and in storage.
- Decentralized technologies implement cryptographic mechanisms on endpoints to control how sensitive/regulated data is encrypted during transmission and in storage.
- Systems, applications and services that store, process or transmit sensitive/regulated data use cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of information as an alternate to physical safeguards.
- The IT department implements Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys.
- The IT department implements and maintains an internal PKI infrastructure or obtains PKI services from a reputable PKI service provider.
- The PKI infrastructure enables the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.
- The PKI infrastructure ensures the availability of information in the event of the loss of cryptographic keys by individual users.
- The PKI infrastructure enables the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.
- The PKI management function enables the implementation of cryptographic key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Cryptographic Protections (CRY) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implements Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys. o Implements and maintains an internal PKI infrastructure or obtains PKI services from a reputable PKI service provider.
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cryptographic protections.
- The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures for cryptographic protections.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data using cryptographic protections.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program, including cryptographic protections.
- Data classification and handling criteria govern requirements to encrypt sensitive/regulated data during transmission and in storage.
- Centrally-managed technologies implement cryptographic mechanisms on endpoints to control how sensitive/regulated data is encrypted during transmission and in storage.
- Certificate management is centrally-managed and the use of certificates is monitored.
- Cryptographic keys are proactively managed to protect the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (CIA) of cryptographic capabilities.
- Systems, applications and services that store, process or transmit sensitive/regulated data use cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of information as an alternate to physical safeguards.
- An IT infrastructure team, or similar function:
- IT/cybersecurity personnel perform an annual review of deployed cryptographic cipher suites and protocols to identify and replace weak cryptographic cipher suites and protocols.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to facilitate the production and management of asymmetric cryptographic keys using Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS)-compliant key management technology and processes that protect the user’s private key.
Assessment Objectives
- CRY-09.2_A01 asymmetric cryptographic keys are produced using organization-defined criteria.
- CRY-09.2_A02 asymmetric cryptographic keys are controlled using organization-defined criteria.
- CRY-09.2_A03 asymmetric cryptographic keys are distributed using organization-defined criteria.
- CRY-09.2_A04 one of the following organization-defined values is selected: (1) NSA-approved key management technology and processes. (2) prepositioned keying material. (3) DoD-approved or DoD-issued Medium Assurance PKI certificates. (4) DoD-approved or DoD-issued Medium Hardware Assurance PKI certificates and hardware security tokens that protect the user’s private key. or (5) certificates issued in accordance with organization-defined requirements.
Evidence Requirements
- E-CRY-01 Cryptographic Protections
-
Documented evidence of organization-approved cryptographic solutions and modules for both data at rest and in transit.
Cryptographic Protections
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Cryptographic governance program
Small
- Cryptographic governance program
Medium
- Cryptographic governance program
Large
- Cryptographic governance program
Enterprise
- Cryptographic governance program