Skip to main content

CRY-09.4: Control & Distribution of Cryptographic Keys

CRY 9 — Critical Protect

Mechanisms exist to facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.

Control Question: Does the organization facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes?

General (11)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC6.1-POF11
CSA CCM 4 CEK-10 CEK-11 CEK-12 CEK-15
ISO 27002 2022 8.24
ISO 27017 2015 10.1.2
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 TS-3.0 TS-3.1
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.13.10
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 3.6.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 3.6.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 3.6.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure CRY-09.4
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats CRY-09.4
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 9.2(c)(i) 9.2(c)(ii) 9.2(c)(iii) 9.2(c)(iv) 9.2(c)(v)
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 8.9 8.11
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Japan ISMAP 10.1.2 10.1.2.20.PB
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 10.2.5
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.13.10

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Cryptographic Protections (CRY) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Cryptographic management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for cryptographic management.
  • Data classification and handling criteria govern requirements to encrypt sensitive/regulated data during transmission and in storage.
  • Decentralized technologies implement cryptographic mechanisms on endpoints to control how sensitive/regulated data is encrypted during transmission and in storage.
  • Systems, applications and services that store, process or transmit sensitive/regulated data use cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of information as an alternate to physical safeguards.
  • The IT department implements Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys.
  • The IT department implements and maintains an internal PKI infrastructure or obtains PKI services from a reputable PKI service provider.
  • The PKI infrastructure enables the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.
  • The PKI infrastructure ensures the availability of information in the event of the loss of cryptographic keys by individual users.
  • The PKI infrastructure enables the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.
  • The PKI management function enables the implementation of cryptographic key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Cryptographic Protections (CRY) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implements Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) key management controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of keys. o Implements and maintains an internal PKI infrastructure or obtains PKI services from a reputable PKI service provider.

  • The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cryptographic protections.
  • The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures for cryptographic protections.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data using cryptographic protections.
  • A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program, including cryptographic protections.
  • Data classification and handling criteria govern requirements to encrypt sensitive/regulated data during transmission and in storage.
  • Centrally-managed technologies implement cryptographic mechanisms on endpoints to control how sensitive/regulated data is encrypted during transmission and in storage.
  • Certificate management is centrally-managed and the use of certificates is monitored.
  • Cryptographic keys are proactively managed to protect the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (CIA) of cryptographic capabilities.
  • Systems, applications and services that store, process or transmit sensitive/regulated data use cryptographic mechanisms to prevent unauthorized disclosure of information as an alternate to physical safeguards.
  • An IT infrastructure team, or similar function:
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel perform an annual review of deployed cryptographic cipher suites and protocols to identify and replace weak cryptographic cipher suites and protocols.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to facilitate the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys using industry recognized key management technology and processes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. CRY-09.4_A01 a centrally-managed cryptographic key management solution facilitates the secure distribution of symmetric and asymmetric cryptographic keys.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Cryptographic governance program

Small

  • Cryptographic governance program

Medium

  • Cryptographic governance program

Large

  • Cryptographic governance program

Enterprise

  • Cryptographic governance program

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.