Skip to main content

DCH-03: Media Access

DCH 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to control and restrict access to digital and non-digital media to authorized individuals.

Control Question: Does the organization control and restrict access to digital and non-digital media to authorized individuals?

General (33)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) C1.1
CIS CSC 8.1 3.1 3.3
CIS CSC 8.1 IG1 3.1 3.3
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 3.1 3.3
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 3.1 3.3
CSA CCM 4 DSP-10 HRS-03
GovRAMP Low MP-02
GovRAMP Low+ MP-02
GovRAMP Moderate MP-02
GovRAMP High MP-02
ISO 27002 2022 7.10
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 OP-3.2
NIST 800-53 R4 MP-2
NIST 800-53 R4 (low) MP-2
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) MP-2
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) MP-2
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) MP-2
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) MP-2
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) MP-2
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) MP-2
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay MP-2
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay MP-2
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay MP-2
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.1.3 3.8.2
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.1.3[c] 3.8.2
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.03 03.08.01 03.08.02
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.08.02
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) PR.DS
SWIFT CSF 2023 2.11A
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) DCH-03
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational DCH-03
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure DCH-03
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats DCH-03
US (25)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-39
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2301
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.03 03.08.01 03.08.02

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to control and restrict access to digital and non-digital media to authorized individuals.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to control and restrict access to digital and non-digital media to authorized individuals.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Data Classification & Handling (DCH) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed to identify data repositories and data flows. o Create and maintain Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams. o Are expected to take the initiative to work with Data Protection Officers (DPOs) to ensure applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations are properly addressed, including the storage, transmission and processing of sensitive/regulated data o Geolocation requirements for sensitive/regulated data types, including the transfer of data to third-countries or international organizations. o Requirements for minimizing data collection to what is necessary for business purposes. o Requirements for limiting the use of sensitive/regulated data in testing, training and research.

  • Data management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for data management.
  • Data protection controls are primarily administrative and preventative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to classify, protect and dispose of systems and data, including storage media.
  • A data classification process exists to identify categories of data and specific protection requirements.
  • A data retention process exists and is a manual process to govern.
  • Data/process owners:
  • A manual data retention process exists.
  • Content filtering blocks users from performing ad hoc file transfers through unapproved file transfer services (e.g., Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.).
  • Mobile Device Management (MDM) software is used to restrict and protect the data that resides on mobile devices.
  • Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Administrative means (e.g., policies and standards) dictate:
Level 3 — Well Defined

Data Classification & Handling (DCH) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Are expected to take the initiative to work with Data Protection Officers (DPOs) to ensure applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations are properly addressed, including the storage, transmission and processing of sensitive/regulated data. o Maintain decentralized inventory logs of all sensitive/regulated media and update sensitive/regulated media inventories at least annually. o Create and maintain Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams. o Document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed in order to document data repositories and data flows. o Identify data classification types to ensure adequate cybersecurity and data protection controls are in place to protect organizational information and individual data privacy. o Identify and document the location of information on which the information resides. o Restrict and govern the transfer of data to third-countries or international organizations. o Limit the disclosure of data to authorized parties. o Mark media in accordance with data protection requirements so that personnel are alerted to distribution limitations, handling caveats and applicable security requirements. o Prohibit “rogue instances” where unapproved third parties are engaged to store, process or transmit data, including budget reviews and firewall connection authorizations. o Protect and control digital and non-digital media during transport outside of controlled areas using appropriate security measures. o Govern the use of personal devices (e.g., Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)) as part of acceptable and unacceptable behaviors. o Dictate requirements for minimizing data collection to what is necessary for business purposes. o Dictate requirements for limiting the use of sensitive/regulated data in testing, training and research.

  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, assists users in making information sharing decisions to ensure data is appropriately protected, regardless of where or how it is stored, processed and/ or transmitted.
  • A data classification process exists to identify categories of data and specific protection requirements.
  • A data retention process exists to protect archived data in accordance with applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations.
  • Data/process owners:
  • A Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) is used to help ensure the protection of sensitive/regulated data processed, stored or transmitted on internal or external systems, in order to implement cybersecurity and data protection controls in accordance with applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations.
  • Human Resources (HR), documents formal “rules of behavior” as an employment requirement that stipulates acceptable and unacceptable practices pertaining to sensitive/regulated data handling.
  • Data Loss Prevention (DLP), or similar content filtering capabilities, blocks users from performing ad hoc file transfers through unapproved file transfer services (e.g., Box, Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.).
  • Mobile Device Management (MDM) software is used to restrict and protect the data that resides on mobile devices.
  • Administrative processes and technologies:
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Data Classification & Handling (DCH) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to control and restrict access to digital and non-digital media to authorized individuals.

Assessment Objectives

  1. DCH-03_A01 access to sensitive / regulated data on system media is restricted to authorized personnel or roles.
  2. DCH-03_A02 types of digital media to which access is restricted are defined.
  3. DCH-03_A03 personnel or roles authorized to access digital media is/are defined.
  4. DCH-03_A04 types of non-digital media to which access is restricted are defined.
  5. DCH-03_A05 personnel or roles authorized to access non-digital media is/are defined.
  6. DCH-03_A06 access to types of non-digital media is restricted to personnel or roles.
  7. DCH-03_A07 access to CUI on system media is restricted to authorized personnel or roles.

Evidence Requirements

E-IAM-02 Defined Roles & Authorizations (RBAC)

Documented evidence of defined access control-specific roles (e.g., Role Based Access Control (RBAC)) that affect both logical and physical access authorizations.

Identity & Access Management

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Logical Access Control (LAC)
  • Physical Access Control (PAC)

Small

  • Logical Access Control (LAC)
  • Physical Access Control (PAC)

Medium

  • Logical Access Control (LAC)
  • Physical Access Control (PAC)
  • Data governance program

Large

  • Logical Access Control (LAC)
  • Physical Access Control (PAC)
  • Data governance program

Enterprise

  • Logical Access Control (LAC)
  • Physical Access Control (PAC)
  • Data governance program

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.