END-07: Host Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)
Mechanisms exist to utilize Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or similar technologies, to monitor for and protect against anomalous host activity, including lateral movement across the network.
Control Question: Does the organization utilize Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or similar technologies, to monitor for and protect against anomalous host activity, including lateral movement across the network?
General (10)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC6.8 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 13.2 13.7 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 | 13.2 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 13.2 13.7 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | SAP-06 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.14.06.a.01 03.14.06.a.02 03.14.06.b 03.14.06.c |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | N.7 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | END-07 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | END-07 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | END-07 |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | 5.10.1.3 |
| US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 | 3.PEP.IN.IDPSY 3.PEP.WE.ACMIT 3.PEP.SE.ACMIT |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 1.L.A 2.L.C 2.L.D |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.14(b)(1) |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 7.4 7.5 12.18 12.24 23.6 |
| EMEA Spain CCN-STIC 825 | 7.6.1 [OP.MON.1] |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1034 ISM-1341 ISM-1418 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 18.4.13.C.01 |
Americas (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada CSAG | 4.3 4.4 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.14.06.A.01 03.14.06.A.02 03.14.06.B 03.14.06.C |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to utilize Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or similar technologies, to monitor for and protect against anomalous host activity, including lateral movement across the network.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Endpoint Security (END) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Asset management is informally assigned as an additional duty to existing IT/cybersecurity personnel.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel use an informal process to design, build and maintain secure configurations for test, development, staging and production environments, including the implementation of appropriate cybersecurity and data protection controls.
- Anti-malware technologies are decentralized but are deployed on all technology assets that can run Anti-malware software.
- Data management is decentralized.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Endpoint Security (END) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Endpoint security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for endpoint security management.
- Anti-malware technologies are decentralized but are deployed on all technology assets that can run anti-malware software.
- Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Technologies are configured to protect data with the strength and integrity commensurate with the classification or sensitivity of the information and mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides), including cryptographic protections for sensitive/regulated data.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Endpoint Security (END) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Configuration management is centralized for all operating systems, applications, servers and other configurable technologies.
- Technologies are configured to protect data with the strength and integrity commensurate with the classification or sensitivity of the information and conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides), including test, development, staging and production environments.
- Configurations conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides) for test, development, staging and production environments.
- An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, centrally manages anti-malware and anti-phishing technologies, in accordance with industry-recognized practices for Prevention, Detection & Response (PDR) activities.
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool, is tuned to detect and respond to anomalous behavior that could indicate account compromise or other malicious activities.
- The Human Resources (HR) department ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices.
- Unauthorized configuration changes are responded to in accordance with an Incident Response Plan (IRP) to determine if the any unauthorized configuration is malicious in nature.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Endpoint Security (END) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to utilize Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or similar technologies, to monitor for and protect against anomalous host activity, including lateral movement across the network.
Assessment Objectives
- END-07_A01 Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or a similar technology, is deployed on business-critical systems.
- END-07_A02 Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS), or a similar technology, is deployed on systems that store, process and/or transmit sensitive / regulated data.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)
Small
- Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)
Medium
- Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)
Large
- Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)
Enterprise
- Host-based Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (HIDS / HIPS)