HRS-01: Human Resources Security Management
Mechanisms exist to facilitate the implementation of personnel security controls.
Control Question: Does the organization facilitate the implementation of personnel security controls?
General (54)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC1.1 CC1.1-POF1 CC1.1-POF3 CC1.2-POF1 CC1.2-POF2 CC1.2-POF3 CC1.2-POF4 CC1.3-POF6 CC1.4 CC1.4-POF1 CC1.4-POF2 CC1.4-POF3 CC1.5-POF2 CC1.5-POF3 CC1.5-POF4 CC1.5-POF5 CC2.2-POF3 CC2.3-POF4 CC3.3-POF1 CC3.3-POF2 CC3.3-POF3 CC3.3-POF4 CC3.3-POF5 |
| BSI Standard 200-1 | 6 |
| COBIT 2019 | APO07.01 APO07.04 APO07.05 APO07.06 |
| COSO 2017 | Principle 1 Principle 4 Principle 5 |
| CSA CCM 4 | HRS-01 HRS-02 HRS-03 HRS-04 |
| ENISA 2.0 | SO7 SO8 |
| GovRAMP Low | PS-01 |
| GovRAMP Low+ | PS-01 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | PS-01 |
| GovRAMP High | PS-01 |
| ISO/SAE 21434 2021 | RQ-05-06 |
| ISO 22301 2019 | 8.4.2.1 |
| ISO 27001 2022 (source) | 7.3 7.3(a) 7.3(b) 7.3(c) 7.2(d) |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.4 |
| ISO 27701 2025 | 7.2 |
| ISO 42001 2023 | 7.2 |
| MPA Content Security Program 5.1 | OR-3.0 PS-2.0 |
| NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) | 4.C(4)(a) |
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | GOVERN 4.1 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | PR.PO-P9 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (low) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-160 | 3.2.4 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | PS-1 |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | 3.1.22 NFO-PS-1 |
| NIST 800-171A (source) | 3.2.2[a] 3.2.2[b] 3.2.2[c] 3.9.2[a] |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.01.01.g.02 03.15.03.a 03.15.03.d |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.01.01.ODP[01] A.03.01.01.ODP[02] A.03.01.01.ODP[03] A.03.01.01.ODP[04] |
| NIST 800-218 | PO.2.1 |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | GV.RR-04 ID.AM |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 12.2 12.2.1 12.7 12.7.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 12.2.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 12.2.1 12.7.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 12.2.1 12.7.1 |
| SWIFT CSF 2023 | 5.1 5.3A |
| TISAX ISA 6 | 8.2.5 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | HRS-01 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | HRS-01 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | HRS-01 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | HRS-01 |
US (35)
EMEA (17)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 | 3.3.2(15) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 | 21.2(i) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 10.1.1 10.1.3 10.2.3 |
| EMEA Austria | Sec 14 Sec 15 |
| EMEA Belgium | 16 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 19.1 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 | 1-5 2-5 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia IoT CGIoT-1 2024 | 1-3-2 1-8-1 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 1-9-1 1-9-6 2-6-4 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 1-7 1-7-2 1-8 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-6 TPC-71 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SAMA CSF 1.0 | 3.3.1 |
| EMEA South Africa | 19 20 |
| EMEA Spain BOE-A-2022-7191 | 15.1 |
| EMEA Spain 311/2022 | 15.1 |
| EMEA UAE NIAF | 3.2.3 |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 1300 2702 |
APAC (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC China Cybersecurity Law | 34(1) |
| APAC India DPDPA 2023 | 21(1)(a) 21(1)(b) 21(1)(c) 21(1)(d) 21(1)(e) 21(2) 22(1) 22(2) 22(3) |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | GV.RR.S6 RS.CO.S1 |
| APAC Japan APPI | 21 |
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 4.5.2 4.5.2.1 4.5.2.2 4.5.2.3 4.5.2.4 4.5.2.5 4.5.2.6 4.5.2.7 4.5.2.8 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HML02 HSUP02 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 | HSUP02 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 9.2.10.C.01 9.2.11.C.01 9.2.11.C.02 14.3.5.C.01 15.1.7.C.01 |
| APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 | 3.5.1 3.5.2 |
Americas (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Bermuda BMACCC | 5.13 |
| Americas Canada CSAG | 1.5 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.01.G.02 03.15.03.A 03.15.03.D |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to facilitate the implementation of personnel security controls.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
- Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
- HR, in conjunction with IT personnel establishes redundancy for vital cybersecurity and data privacy staff.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.
- Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for Human Resources (HR) practices.
- The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for personnel management.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to personnel management.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program, including HR practices.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to facilitate the implementation of personnel security controls.
Assessment Objectives
- HRS-01_A01 personnel security procedures to facilitate the implementation of the personnel security policy and associated personnel security controls are developed and documented.
- HRS-01_A02 an official to manage the personnel security policy and procedures is defined.
- HRS-01_A03 a personnel security policy is developed and documented.
- HRS-01_A04 the personnel security policy is disseminated to organization-defined personnel or roles.
- HRS-01_A05 personnel or roles to whom the personnel security policy is to be disseminated is/are defined.
- HRS-01_A06 personnel or roles to whom the personnel security procedures are to be disseminated is/are defined.
- HRS-01_A07 the frequency at which the current personnel security policy is reviewed / updated is defined.
- HRS-01_A08 events that would require the current personnel security policy to be reviewed / updated are defined.
- HRS-01_A09 the frequency at which the current personnel security procedures are reviewed / updated is defined.
- HRS-01_A10 events that would require the personnel security procedures to be reviewed / updated are defined.
- HRS-01_A11 the personnel security procedures are disseminated to organization-defined personnel or roles.
- HRS-01_A12 the organization's personnel security policy addresses purpose.
- HRS-01_A13 the organization's personnel security policy addresses scope.
- HRS-01_A14 the organization's personnel security policy addresses roles.
- HRS-01_A15 the organization's personnel security policy addresses responsibilities.
- HRS-01_A16 the organization's personnel security policy addresses management commitment.
- HRS-01_A17 the organization's personnel security policy addresses coordination among organizational entities.
- HRS-01_A18 the organization's personnel security policy addresses compliance.
- HRS-01_A19 the organization's personnel security policy is consistent with applicable laws, Executive Orders, directives, regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines.
- HRS-01_A20 an organization-defined official is designated to manage the development, documentation, and dissemination of the personnel security policy and procedures.
- HRS-01_A21 the current personnel security policy is reviewed / updated organization-defined frequency.
- HRS-01_A22 the current personnel security policy is reviewed / updated following organization-defined events.
- HRS-01_A23 the current personnel security procedures are reviewed / updated organization-defined frequency.
- HRS-01_A24 the current personnel security procedures are reviewed / updated following organization-defined events.
- HRS-01_A25 information security-related duties, roles, and responsibilities are defined.
- HRS-01_A26 information security-related duties, roles, and responsibilities are assigned to designated personnel.
- HRS-01_A27 personnel are adequately trained to carry out their assigned information security-related duties, roles, and responsibilities.
- HRS-01_A28 criteria and/or process for terminating system access authorization and any credentials coincident with personnel actions is established.
- HRS-01_A29 the time period for account inactivity before disabling is defined.
- HRS-01_A30 the time period within which to notify account managers and designated personnel or roles when accounts are no longer required is defined.
- HRS-01_A31 the time period within which to notify account managers and designated personnel or roles when users are terminated or transferred is defined.
- HRS-01_A32 the time period within which to notify account managers and designated personnel or roles when system usage or the need-to-know changes for an individual is defined.
- HRS-01_A33 personnel management operations are conducted according to documented policies, standards, procedures and/or other organizational directives.
- HRS-01_A34 adequate resources (e.g., people, processes, technologies, data and/or facilities) are provided to support personnel management operations.
- HRS-01_A35 responsibility and authority for the performance of personnel management-related activities are assigned to designated personnel.
- HRS-01_A36 personnel performing personnel management-related activities have the skills and knowledge needed to perform their assigned duties.
Evidence Requirements
- E-HRS-01 Position Categorization
-
Documented evidence of a discrete roles for cybersecurity & data privacy functions (e.g., position categorization).
Human Resources - E-HRS-15 Organization Chart
-
Current and accurate organization chart that depicts logical staff hierarchies.
Human Resources - E-HRS-27 Personnel Sanctions
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally sanction unacceptable behavior(s).
Human Resources