HRS-05.3: Technology Use Restrictions
Mechanisms exist to establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for organizational technologies based on the potential to cause damage to Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS), if used maliciously.
Control Question: Does the organization establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for communications technologies based on the potential to cause damage to Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS), if used maliciously?
General (39)
US (13)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | WORKFORCE-1.E.MIL2 |
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | 5.10.1.4 5.10.2 5.13.1.2.2 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | SC-19 SC-ACA-1 SC-ACA-2 |
| US DHS ZTCF | HRS-05.3 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | SC-19 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | SC-19 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | SC-19 |
| US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) | 164.310(b) |
| US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) | 164.310(b) |
| US IRS 1075 | PL-4 |
| US NISPOM 2020 | 8-700 |
| US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 | PL-4 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | SC-19 |
EMEA (5)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 5.4 9.5 15.6 19.6 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 | 2-5 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 1-9-4-2 2-1-3 2-6-4 2-15-3-4 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-8 TPC-9 |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 2604 |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 4.5.2 4.5.2.8 8.1.3 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 9.3.4.C.01 9.3.5.C.01 9.3.5.C.02 9.3.9.C.01 9.3.10.C.01 15.1.7.C.01 21.1.22.C.01 21.1.22.C.02 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.01.H 03.01.12.A 03.01.18.A 03.15.03.A |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for communications technologies based on the potential to cause damage to Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS), if used maliciously.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
- Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.
- Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data privacy policies and provide acknowledgement.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data privacy principles in their daily work.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data privacy training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
- Rules of behavior affecting the use of communications technologies reflects the organization's corporate culture and risk threshold.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for communications technologies based on the potential to cause damage to Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS), if used maliciously.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to establish usage restrictions and implementation guidance for communications technologies based on the potential to cause damage to Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS), if used maliciously.
Assessment Objectives
- HRS-05.3_A01 rules that describe responsibilities and expected behavior for system usage and protecting sensitive / regulated data are established.
- HRS-05.3_A02 before authorizing access to information and the system, a documented acknowledgement from such individuals indicating that they have read, understand and agree to abide by the rules of behavior is received.
- HRS-05.3_A03 rules that describe responsibilities and expected behavior for system usage and protecting CUI are established.
Evidence Requirements
- E-HRS-22 Rules of Behavior
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to define "acceptable use" or "rules of behavior" criteria that specify acceptable and unacceptable user behaviors.
Human Resources
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Formal onboarding training
- Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)
Small
- Formal onboarding training
- Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)
Medium
- Formal onboarding training
- Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)
Large
- Formal onboarding training
- Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)
Enterprise
- Formal onboarding training
- Acceptable Use / Rules of Behavior (RoB)