HRS-13: Identify Critical Skills & Gaps
Mechanisms exist to evaluate the critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support the organization's mission and identify gaps that exist.
Control Question: Does the organization evaluate the critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support its mission and identify gaps that exist?
General (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC1.4-POF2 CC1.4-POF3 CC1.4-POF4 |
| COBIT 2019 | APO01.08 APO07.03 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | HRS-13 |
US (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | WORKFORCE-3.F.MIL3 |
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | HRM:SG1.SP2 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to evaluate the critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support its mission and identify gaps that exist.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Personnel management is decentralized, with the responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to the user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- The Human Resources (HR) department provides guidance on HR practices for hiring, retaining and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization.
- Terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior are at the discretion of users’ management.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data protection principles in their daily work.
- HR, in conjunction with IT personnel evaluates the business-critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support the organization's mission and identify gaps that exist.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Defines terms of employment, including acceptable and unacceptable rules of behavior for the use of technologies, including consequences for unacceptable behavior.
- Personnel management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for personnel management.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- The responsibility for training users and enforcing policies being assigned to user’s immediate supervisor(s)/manager(s), including the definition and enforcement of the user’s specific role(s) and responsibilities.
- Personnel managers ensure personnel are routinely made aware of the organization's cybersecurity / data protection policies and provide acknowledgement.
- Administrative processes require all employees and contractors to apply cybersecurity and data protection principles in their daily work.
- The HR department, in conjunction with cybersecurity personnel evaluates the business-critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support the organization's mission and identify gaps that exist.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Ensures industry-recognized HR practices are implemented for hiring, managing, training, investigating and terminating employees, contractors and other personnel that work on behalf of the organization. o Ensures that every user accessing a system that processes, stores, or transmits sensitive/regulated data is cleared and regularly trained in proper data handling practices. o Identifies and implements industry-recognized HR practices related to cybersecurity and data protection training and awareness to help ensure secure practices are implemented in personnel operations to help manage risk to both technology assets and data. o Manages personnel security risk by assigning a risk designation to all positions and establishing screening criteria for individuals filling those positions.
- The Human Resources (HR) department:
- Administrative processes require Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) or similar confidentiality agreements that reflect the needs to protect data and operational details, for both employees and third-parties.
- The HR department, in conjunction with cybersecurity personnel, evaluates the business-critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support the organization's mission and identify gaps that exist.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Human Resources Security (HRS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to evaluate the critical cybersecurity and data protection skills needed to support its mission and identify gaps that exist.
Assessment Objectives
- HRS-13_A01 critical cybersecurity / data privacy skills needed to support the organization's mission are defined.
- HRS-13_A02 gaps / shortfalls in identified critical cybersecurity / data privacy skills needed to support the organization's mission are identified.
Evidence Requirements
- E-HRS-23 Critical Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Skills
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally identify critical cybersecurity skills needed to support business operations.
Human Resources - E-HRS-24 Critical Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Skill Gaps
-
Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally identify critical cybersecurity & data privacy skill gaps.
Human Resources
Technology Recommendations
Medium
- Identification of critical skills per team/department
- Formal assessment to identify skills gaps
Large
- Identification of critical skills per team/department
- Formal assessment to identify skills gaps
Enterprise
- Identification of critical skills per team/department
- Formal assessment to identify skills gaps