Skip to main content

IAC-02.2: Replay-Resistant Authentication

IAC 9 — Critical Protect

Automated mechanisms exist to employ replay-resistant authentication.

Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to employ replay-resistant authentication?

General (29)
Framework Mapping Values
GovRAMP Moderate IA-02(08)
GovRAMP High IA-02(08)
NIST 800-53 R4 IA-2(8) IA-2(9)
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) IA-2(8)
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) IA-2(8) IA-2(9)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) IA-2(8)
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) IA-2(8)
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) IA-2(8)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) IA-2(8)
NIST 800-63B 5.2.8
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay IA-2(8)
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay IA-2(8)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay IA-2(8)
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.5.4
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.5.4
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.05.04 03.07.05.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.05.04[01] A.03.05.04[02] A.03.07.05.b[02]
NIST 800-172 3.5.1e
NIST CSF 2.0 (source) PR.AA-04
OWASP Top 10 2021 A07:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 8.5.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 8.5.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 8.5.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 8.5.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 8.5.1
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IAC-02.2
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational IAC-02.2
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IAC-02.2
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IAC-02.2
US (15)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 4.31
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 2215
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1055 ISM-1603
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.05.04 03.07.05.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to employ replay-resistant authentication.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to employ replay-resistant authentication.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.

  • Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
  • IT personnel:
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
  • An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
  • Technologies are configured to incorporate replay-resistant authentication mechanisms to protect network access.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to employ replay-resistant authentication.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to employ replay-resistant authentication.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IAC-02.2_A01 replay-resistant authentication mechanisms for access to privileged accounts are implemented.
  2. IAC-02.2_A02 replay-resistant authentication mechanisms for access to non-privileged accounts are implemented.
  3. IAC-02.2_A03 replay resistance is implemented in the establishment of nonlocal maintenance and diagnostic sessions.
  4. IAC-02.2_A04 systems and system components to identify and authenticate are defined.
  5. IAC-02.2_A05 bidirectional authentication that is cryptographically-based is implemented.
  6. IAC-02.2_A06 bidirectional authentication that is replay-resistant is implemented.
  7. IAC-02.2_A07 systems and system components are identified and authenticated before establishing a network connection using bidirectional authentication that is cryptographically-based and replay- resistant.

Evidence Requirements

E-AST-01 IT Asset Management (ITAM)

Documented evidence of an IT Asset Management (ITAM) program that addresses the due diligence and due care activities associated with maintaining both secure and compliant systems, applications and services.

Asset Management
E-IAM-05 Identity & Access Management (IAM) Function

Documented evidence of an Identity & Access Management (IAM), or similar function, that facilitates the implementation of identification and access management controls.

Identity & Access Management
E-IAM-06 Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) Solution

Documented evidence of an Authenticate, Authorize and Audit (AAA) solution (on-premises and hosted by External Service Providers (ESP)).

Identity & Access Management

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Medium

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Identity & Access Management (IAM) program

Large

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Identity & Access Management (IAM) program

Enterprise

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Identity & Access Management (IAM) program

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.