Skip to main content

IAC-07.1: Change of Roles & Duties

IAC 10 — Critical Protect

Mechanisms exist to revoke user access rights following changes in personnel roles and duties, if no longer necessary or permitted.

Control Question: Does the organization revoke user access rights following changes in personnel roles and duties, if no longer necessary or permitted?

General (19)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC6.2 CC6.2-POF1 CC6.2-POF2 CC6.3-POF1 CC6.3-POF2
COBIT 2019 DSS06.03
CSA CCM 4 IAM-07 IAM-16
ENISA 2.0 SO7
ISO 27002 2022 5.18
ISO 27017 2015 9.2.5
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 ID.IM-P2
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.01.g.01 03.01.01.g.02 03.01.01.g.03 03.05.05.a 03.09.02.b.02
OWASP Top 10 2021 A01:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 7.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 7.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 7.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) 8.2.4 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 7.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 7.2.3 8.2.4 8.2.5
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IAC-07.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IAC-07.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IAC-07.1
US (6)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 ACCESS-2.F.MIL2 ACCESS-2.G.MIL2
US CISA CPG 2022 2.D
US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)
US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)
US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice 3.M.B
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 3.M.B
EMEA (4)
APAC (5)
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.01.G.01 03.01.01.G.02 03.01.01.G.03 03.05.05.A 03.09.02.B.02

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to revoke user access rights following changes in personnel roles and duties, if no longer necessary or permitted.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Identity & Access Management (IAM) is decentralized where Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, may be used to centrally manage identities and permissions, but asset/process owners are authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
  • IT personnel identify and implement IAM cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.

  • Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
  • IT personnel:
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
  • An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to revoke user access rights following changes in personnel roles and duties, if no longer necessary or permitted.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IAC-07.1_A01 user access rights are revoked following changes in personnel roles and duties, if no longer necessary or permitted.

Evidence Requirements

E-HRS-12 Role Review

Documented evidence of a formal review process to ensure personnel roles currently reflect business needs.

Human Resources
E-HRS-19 Deprovisioning Checklist (Offboarding)

Documented evidence of personnel management practices to formally offboard personnel from their assigned roles due to employment termination or role change.

Human Resources

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.