IAC-12: Cryptographic Module Authentication
Mechanisms exist to ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Control Question: Does the organization ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength?
General (20)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP Low | IA-07 |
| GovRAMP Low+ | IA-07 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | IA-07 |
| GovRAMP High | IA-07 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (low) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | IA-7 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | IA-7 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 3.6.1.1 3.6.1.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 3.6.1.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 3.6.1.1 3.6.1.2 |
| UL 2900-1 2017 | 8.3 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | IAC-12 |
US (18)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | TM:SG4.SP1 |
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | IA-7 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (low) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (LI-SaaS) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | IA-7 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) | IA-7 |
| US IRS 1075 | IA-7 |
| US NISPOM 2020 | 8-607 |
| US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 | IA-7 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 1 | IA-7 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | IA-7 |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 4.37 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Identity & Access Management (IAM) is decentralized where Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, may be used to centrally manage identities and permissions, but asset/process owners are authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services.
- IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
- IT personnel identify and implement IAM cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.
- Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
- IT personnel:
- Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
- IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
- Administrative processes and technologies ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
- The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
- An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
- Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
- Administrative processes and technologies ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure cryptographic modules adhere to applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security strength.
Assessment Objectives
- IAC-12_A01 mechanisms for authentication to a cryptographic module are implemented that meet the requirements of applicable laws, executive orders, directives, policies, regulations, standards and guidelines for such authentication.