Skip to main content

IAC-25: Session Termination

IAC 9 — Critical Protect

Automated mechanisms exist to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity?

General (28)
Framework Mapping Values
GovRAMP Low+ AC-12
GovRAMP Moderate AC-12
GovRAMP High AC-12
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1021.001, T1072, T1185, T1563.002
NIST 800-53 R4 AC-12
NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) AC-12
NIST 800-53 R4 (high) AC-12
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AC-12
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) AC-12
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) AC-12
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay AC-12
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay AC-12
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.1.11
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.1.11[a] 3.1.11[b]
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.01.h 03.01.11 03.07.05.c
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.01.01.ODP[05] A.03.01.01.ODP[06] A.03.01.01.h A.03.01.11 A.03.01.11.ODP[01] A.03.07.05.c[01]
OWASP Top 10 2021 A01:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 8.2.8
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 8.2.8
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 8.2.8
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 8.2.8
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 8.2.8
Shared Assessments SIG 2025 U.1.4
SPARTA CM0036
UL 2900-1 2017 8.2
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IAC-25
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IAC-25
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IAC-25
US (18)
EMEA (3)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 11.6.2(e)
EMEA Germany C5 2020 PSS-06
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 2-2-1-4
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0853
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 16.1.44.C.01
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.01.h 03.01.11 03.07.05.c

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Identity & Access Management (IAM) is decentralized where Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, may be used to centrally manage identities and permissions, but asset/process owners are authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
  • IT personnel identify and implement IAM cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.

  • Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
  • IT personnel:
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
  • An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to log out users, both locally on the network and for remote sessions, at the end of the session or after an organization-defined period of inactivity.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IAC-25_A01 conditions requiring a user session to terminate are defined.
  2. IAC-25_A02 conditions or trigger events that require session disconnect are defined.
  3. IAC-25_A03 a user session is automatically terminated after any of the defined conditions occur.
  4. IAC-25_A04 the time period of expected inactivity requiring users to log out of the system is defined.
  5. IAC-25_A05 circumstances requiring users to log out of the system are defined.
  6. IAC-25_A06 users are required to log out of the system after <A.03.01.01.ODP[05]: time period> of expected inactivity or when the following circumstances occur: <A.03.01.01.ODP[06]: circumstances>.
  7. IAC-25_A07 session connections are terminated when nonlocal maintenance is completed.
  8. IAC-25_A08 a user session is terminated automatically after <A.03.01.11.ODP[01]: conditions or trigger events>.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Medium

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Large

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

Enterprise

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.