Skip to main content

IAC-28.1: Management Approval For New or Changed Accounts

IAC 10 — Critical Detect

Mechanisms exist to ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts.

Control Question: Does the organization ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts?

General (16)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC6.2-POF1 CC6.3-POF1
CSA CCM 4 IAM-16
NIST 800-53 R4 AC-24 IA-4(2)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) AC-24 IA-12(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) AC-24 IA-12(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay IA-12(1)
NIST 800-161 R1 AC-24
NIST 800-161 R1 Flow Down AC-24
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 AC-24
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 AC-24
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 AC-24
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.01.01.b 03.05.05.a
TISAX ISA 6 4.2.1
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) IAC-28.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure IAC-28.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats IAC-28.1
US (7)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 ACCESS-2.F.MIL2 ACCESS-2.G.MIL2 ACCESS-2.H.MIL3
US CERT RMM 1.2 AM:SG1.SP1 KIM:SG2.SP2
US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)
US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) 164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)
US IRS 1075 IA-12(1)
US NERC CIP 2024 (source) CIP-004-7 6.1
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(3)(C)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 11.2.2(c)
EMEA Germany C5 2020 IDM-01 IDM-02
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0405
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.01.01.B 03.05.05.A

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Implement and maintain an Identity & Access Management (IAM) capability for all users to implement “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts. o Govern IAM technologies via RBAC to prohibit privileged access by non-organizational users, unless there is an explicit support contract for privileged IT support services.

  • Logical Access Control (LAC) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for logical access control.
  • IT personnel:
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is primarily used to centrally manage identities and permissions with RBAC. Due to technical or business limitations, asset/process owners are empowered to operate a decentralized access control program for their specific systems, applications and services that cannot be integrated into AD.
  • IAM controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards) to manage accounts and permissions.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Identification & Authentication (IAC) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An Identity & Access Management (IAM) function, or similar function, centrally manages permissions and implements “least privileges” Role Based Access Control (RBAC) practices for the management of user, group and system accounts, including privileged accounts.
  • The Human Resources (HR) department governs personnel management operations and notifies IAM personnel of personnel role changes for RBAC-based provisioning and deprovisioning actions.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data that conform to industry-recognized standards for hardening (e.g., DISA STIGs, CIS Benchmarks or OEM security guides).
  • An IT infrastructure team, or similar function, ensures that statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data privacy obligations are addressed to ensure secure configurations are designed, built and maintained.
  • Active Directory (AD), or a similar technology, is used to centrally manage identities and permissions. Only by exception due to a technical or business limitation are solutions authorized to operate a decentralized access control program for systems, applications and services.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure management approvals are required for new accounts or changes in permissions to existing accounts.

Assessment Objectives

  1. IAC-28.1_A01 the registration process to receive an account for logical access includes supervisor or sponsor authorization.
  2. IAC-28.1_A02 access control decisions applied to each access request prior to access enforcement are defined.
  3. IAC-28.1_A03 organization-defined criteria are taken into account to ensure that access control decisions are applied to each access request prior to access enforcement.

Evidence Requirements

E-IAM-09 Access Authorization Records

Documented evidence of access authorization records.

Identity & Access Management

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.