IRO-16: Public Relations & Reputation Repair
Mechanisms exist to proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to the organization's reputation.
Control Question: Does the organization proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to its reputation?
General (7)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | IR-4(15) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | IR-4(16) |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | RC.CO-04 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | IRO-16 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | IRO-16 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | IRO-16 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | IRO-16 |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 | 3.7.5(91) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 | 23.2 |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | RC.CO.S1 |
| APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 | 7.7.5 7.7.6 7.7.7 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to its reputation.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to its reputation.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Incident Response (IRO) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for incident response operations. o Implement and maintain an incident response capability using a documented and tested Incident Response Plan (IRP) to facilitate incident management operations that cover preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Incident response operations are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
Level 3 — Well Defined
Incident Response (IR) processes are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- An Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT), or similar function, exists to form an on-demand, scalable and integrated team of formally-assigned cybersecurity, IT, data privacy and business function representatives that can perform coordinated incident response.
- The ISIRT, or similar function, develops and maintains a documented, program-level Integrated Incident Response Program (IIRP) that provides operational and tactical-level guidance for cybersecurity and data privacy response operations.
- A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, facilitates incident management operations that includes preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery.
- Business Process Owners (BPOs), in conjunction with the SOC and ISIRT functions, develop and maintain a documented Incident Response Plan (IRP) specific to the business process / business unit but inclusive of the organization's larger approach to incident response operations.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes endpoint devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and provides that information to the SOC for Incident Response Operations (IRO).
- The ISIRT components from the legal department and corporate communications coordinate with the Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) for public relations and reputation repair activities.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to its reputation.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to proactively manage public relations associated with incidents and employ appropriate measures to prevent further reputational damage and develop plans to repair any damage to its reputation.
Assessment Objectives
- IRO-16_A01 public relations associated with an incident are managed.
- IRO-16_A02 measures are employed to repair the reputation of the organization.
Evidence Requirements
- E-IRO-09 Formally Assigned Incident Response Roles & Responsibilities
-
Documented evidence of the establishment of a formally-assigned, integrated team of cybersecurity, IT and business function representatives that are capable of addressing cybersecurity & data privacy incident response operations.
Incident Response