MON-01.1: Intrusion Detection & Prevention Systems (IDS & IPS)
Mechanisms exist to implement Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS) technologies on critical systems, key network segments and network choke points.
Control Question: Does the organization implement Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS) technologies on critical systems, key network segments and network choke points?
General (27)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC7.2 CC7.2-POF2 CC7.2-POF3 |
| COBIT 2019 | DSS05.07 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | OPA-04 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | SI-04(01) |
| GovRAMP High | SI-04(01) |
| IEC 62443-4-2 2019 | NDR 3.2 (15.6.1) |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 8.16 |
| MPA Content Security Program 5.1 | TS-2.7 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SI-4(1) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SI-4(1) SI-4(25) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SI-4(1) SI-4(25) |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.13.01.a |
| NIST 800-172 | 3.14.6e |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | DE.CM-01 |
| OWASP Top 10 2021 | A01:2021 A07:2021 A09:2021 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 1.4.3 11.5 11.5.1 11.5.1.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 1.4.3 11.5.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) | 1.4.3 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 1.4.3 11.5.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 1.4.3 11.5.1 11.5.1.1 |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | N.7 |
| SPARTA | CM0032 |
| SWIFT CSF 2023 | 6.5A |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | MON-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | MON-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | MON-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | MON-01.1 |
US (17)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | 5.10.1.3 |
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) | SI.L3-3.14.6E |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | SI-4(1) |
| US DHS ZTCF | APP-02 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | SI-4(1) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | SI-4(1) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | SI-4(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | SI-4(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | SI-4(1) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | SI-4(1) |
| US HIPAA HICP Small Practice | 6.S.C |
| US HIPAA HICP Medium Practice | 6.M.C |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 6.M.C 1.L.A |
| US IRS 1075 | SI-4(1) |
| US SSA EIESR 8.0 | 5.6 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7123(c)(8)(A) |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | SI-4(1) |
EMEA (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 7.4 11.11 12.18 23.6 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 2-5-3-6 |
| EMEA Spain CCN-STIC 825 | 7.6.1 [OP.MON.1] |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 16.6.10.C.01 16.6.10.C.02 18.4.7.C.01 18.4.7.C.02 18.4.7.C.03 18.4.8.C.01 18.4.8.C.02 18.4.8.C.03 18.4.9.C.01 18.4.9.C.02 18.4.10.C.01 18.4.11.C.01 18.4.11.C.02 18.4.11.C.03 18.4.12.C.01 18.4.14.C.01 |
Americas (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada CSAG | 3.3 4.3 4.4 |
| Americas Canada OSFI B-13 | 3.3.2 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.13.01.A |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to implement Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS) technologies on critical systems, key network segments and network choke points.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Generating event logs and the review of event logs is narrowly-focused to business-critical systems and/ or systems that store, processes and/ or transmit sensitive/regulated data.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.
- Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to implement Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS) technologies on critical systems, key network segments and network choke points.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to implement Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS) technologies on critical systems, key network segments and network choke points.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-01.1_A01 visibility into network traffic at external system interfaces is provided to optimize the effectiveness of monitoring devices.
- MON-01.1_A02 visibility into network traffic at key internal system interfaces is provided to optimize the effectiveness of monitoring devices.
- MON-01.1_A03 individual intrusion detection tools are connected to a system-wide intrusion detection system.
- MON-01.1_A04 individual intrusion detection tools are configured into a system-wide intrusion detection system.
Evidence Requirements
- E-MON-01 Event Log Review & Analysis
-
Documented evidence of security event log review and analysis (e.g., system monitoring records).
Event Log Monitoring - E-MON-06 Automated Event Escalation & Reporting
-
Documented evidence of a capability for selected events to alert applicable personnel, or roles, based on the type of event. This can be demonstrated by the configuration of a Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar technology, that helps automate event log analysis and reporting.
Event Log Monitoring - E-MON-07 Situational Awareness
-
Documented evidence of the organization leveraging knowledge of event log generation to gain situational awareness of cross-domain activities (e.g., technology issues, security events, policy violations, service provider activities, remote workforce activities, physical security events, etc.).
Event Log Monitoring
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS)
Small
- Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS)
Medium
- Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS)
- Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Large
- Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS)
- Extended Detection and Response (XDR)
Enterprise
- Intrusion Detection / Prevention Systems (IDS / IPS)
- Extended Detection and Response (XDR)