MON-01.12: Automated Alerts
Mechanisms exist to automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications.
Control Question: Does the organization automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications?
General (14)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC7.2-POF2 |
| CSA CCM 4 | LOG-03 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | MON-03 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SI-4(12) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SI-4(12) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | SI-4(12) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | SI-4(12) |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.03.04.a 03.03.05.b |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.03.05.b |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | DE.AE DE.AE-06 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | MON-01.12 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | MON-01.12 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | MON-01.12 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | MON-01.12 |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CISA CPG 2022 | 2.T |
| US DHS ZTCF | APP-02 SEC-01 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | SI-4(12) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | SI-4(12) |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 | 2-12-3-1 |
APAC (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HHSP69 HML68 HSUP60 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 | HSUP60 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.03.04.A 03.03.05.B |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.
- Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
- A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
- Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to automatically alert incident response personnel to inappropriate or anomalous activities that have potential security incident implications.
Assessment Objectives
- MON-01.12_A01 personnel or roles to be alerted when indications of inappropriate or unusual activity with cybersecurity / data privacy implications occur is/are defined.
- MON-01.12_A02 automated mechanisms used to alert personnel or roles are defined.
- MON-01.12_A03 activities that trigger alerts to personnel or are defined.
- MON-01.12_A04 personnel or roles is/are alerted using automated mechanisms when activities that trigger alerts indicate inappropriate or unusual activities with cybersecurity / data privacy implications.
- MON-01.12_A05 findings are reported to organizational personnel or roles.
Evidence Requirements
- E-MON-06 Automated Event Escalation & Reporting
-
Documented evidence of a capability for selected events to alert applicable personnel, or roles, based on the type of event. This can be demonstrated by the configuration of a Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar technology, that helps automate event log analysis and reporting.
Event Log Monitoring
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Small
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Medium
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Large
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
Enterprise
- Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
- Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)