Skip to main content

MON-01.5: Wireless Intrusion Detection System (WIDS)

MON 5 — Medium Detect

Mechanisms exist to utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks.

Control Question: Does the organization utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks?

General (11)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC7.2
CSA IoT SCF 2 MON-08 MON-10
GovRAMP Moderate SI-04(14)
GovRAMP High SI-04(14)
NIST 800-53 R4 SI-4(14) SI-4(15)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SI-4(14) SI-4(15)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) SI-4(14)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SI-4(15)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay SI-4(14)
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 11.2
SWIFT CSF 2023 6.5A
US (9)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 7.6
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 16.6.10.C.01 16.6.10.C.02 18.4.8.C.01 18.4.8.C.02 18.4.8.C.03

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for situational awareness management. o Configure alerts for critical or sensitive data that is stored, transmitted and processed on assets. o Use a structured process to review and analyze logs.

  • Situational awareness management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • Secure baseline configurations generate logs that contain sufficient information to establish necessary details of activity and allow for forensics analysis.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • A log aggregator, or similar automated tool, provides an event log report generation capability to aid in detecting and assessing anomalous activities on business-critical systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Continuous Monitoring (MON) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Governs asset management that ensures compliance with requirements for asset management. o Leverages a Configuration Management Database (CMDB), or similar tool, as the authoritative source of IT assets. o Centrally collects logs and is protected according to the manufacturer’s security guidelines to protect the integrity of the event logs with cryptographic mechanisms. o Monitors the organization for Indicators of Compromise (IoC) and provides 24x7x365 near real-time alerting capability. o Is configured to alert incident response personnel of detected suspicious events such that incident responders can look to terminate suspicious events.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM), or similar automated tool:
  • Both inbound and outbound network traffic is monitored for unauthorized activities to identify prohibited activities and assist incident handlers with identifying potentially compromised systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to utilize Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS) to identify rogue wireless devices and to detect attack attempts via wireless networks.

Assessment Objectives

  1. MON-01.5_A01 a wireless intrusion detection system is employed to detect potential compromises or breaches.
  2. MON-01.5_A02 an intrusion detection system is employed to monitor wireless communications traffic as the traffic passes from wireless to wireline networks.
  3. MON-01.5_A03 a wireless intrusion detection system is employed to identify rogue wireless devices.
  4. MON-01.5_A04 a wireless intrusion detection system is employed to detect attack attempts on the system.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS)

Small

  • Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS)

Medium

  • Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Large

  • Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Enterprise

  • Wireless Intrusion Detection / Protection Systems (WIDS / WIPS)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.