Skip to main content

NET-03.11: Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR)

NET 6 — Medium Protect

Automated mechanisms exist to implement Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) to remove active content from files traversing trust boundaries, resulting in reconstructed content containing only known safe elements.

Renumbered: Formerly NET-19 in SCF 2025.4.

Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to implement Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) to remove active content from files traversing trust boundaries, resulting in reconstructed content containing only known safe elements?

US (1)
Framework Mapping Values
USA Federal DHS CISA TIC 3.0 3.PEP.FI.CDREC

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

SCR-CMM Level 1 criteria definitions are not available for this control: ▪ A reasonable person would conclude this control requires a structured process. ▪ At this level of maturity, the "ad hoc" nature of performing a capability informally would indicate the intent of the control is not met due to a lack of consistency and formality.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

SCR-CMM Level 2 criteria definitions are not available for this control: ▪ A reasonable person would conclude a well-defined and standardized process is required. ▪ At this level of maturity, the “requirements-driven” nature of performing the control is focused on a localized and/or regionalized implementation, not uniform and consistent across the organization. ▪ Requirements are narrowly scoped for applicability and are primarily derived from compliance obligations (e.g., laws, regulations and contracts).

Level 3 — Well Defined

Network Security (NET) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist: ▪ Policies and standards associated with NET domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function. ▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with NET domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners. ▪ A network security management team, or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain NET domain capabilities. ▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of network security operations (e.g., network management solution and log aggregator). ▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with NET domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls). ▪ Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC) enforce the principles of least privileges and least functionality for boundary protection technologies. ▪ An implemented and operational Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) capability detects the presence of unapproved active content and facilitates its removal, resulting in content with only known safe elements.

Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies. ▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Assessment Objectives

  1. NET-03.11_A01 automated Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) technologies are implemented.
  2. NET-03.11_A02 automated Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) mechanisms are configured to remove active content from files traversing trust boundaries, resulting in reconstructed content containing only known safe elements.
  3. NET-03.11_A03 the trust boundaries at which files are subject to Content Disarm and Reconstruction (CDR) are defined.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Use email gateway with attachment sandboxing

Small

  • Email and web gateway with CDR capability (e.g., Proofpoint, Mimecast)

Medium

  • Content disarm and reconstruction (CDR) solution for email and web

Large

  • Enterprise CDR solution (e.g., OPSWAT MetaDefender, Deep Secure)
  • Integration with email and web gateways

Enterprise

  • Enterprise CDR platform (e.g., OPSWAT MetaDefender, Deep Secure)
  • Multi-engine scanning
  • Sanitization for all inbound content

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.