NET-03.6: Dynamic Isolation & Segregation (Sandboxing)
Automated mechanisms exist to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Control Question: Does the organization use automated mechanisms to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application?
General (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP High | SC-07(20) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SC-7(20) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SC-7(20) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SC-7(20) |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US FedRAMP R4 | SC-7(20) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | SC-7(20) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | SC-7(20) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | SC-7(20) |
EMEA (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-38 |
| EMEA UK Cyber Essentials | 4 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
- Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
- IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
- Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to dynamically isolate (e.g., sandbox) untrusted components during runtime, where the component is isolated in a fault-contained environment but it can still collaborate with the application.
Assessment Objectives
- NET-03.6_A01 system components to be dynamically isolated from other system components are defined.
- NET-03.6_A02 the capability to dynamically isolate organization-defined system components from other system components is provided.