NET-10.1: Architecture & Provisioning for Name / Address Resolution Service
Mechanisms exist to ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation.
Control Question: Does the organization ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation?
General (18)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP Low | SC-22 |
| GovRAMP Low+ | SC-22 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | SC-22 |
| GovRAMP High | SC-22 |
| MITRE ATT&CK 10 | T1071, T1071.001, T1071.002, T1071.003, T1071.004, T1568, T1568.002 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (low) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | SC-22 |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | NFO-SC-22 |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | N.8 |
US (16)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R4 | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (low) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R4 (LI-SaaS) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | SC-22 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) | SC-22 |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 6.L.B |
| US IRS 1075 | SC-22 |
| US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 | SC-22 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 1 | SC-22 |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | SC-22 |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 9.7 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 15.2.22.C.01 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
- IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
- Administrative processes ensure Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution is designed, implemented and managed to protect the security of name / address resolution.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
- Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
- IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
- Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure systems that collectively provide Domain Name Service (DNS) resolution service are fault-tolerant and implement internal/external role separation.
Assessment Objectives
- NET-10.1_A01 the systems that collectively provide name/address resolution services for an organization are fault-tolerant.
- NET-10.1_A02 the systems that collectively provide name/address resolution services for an organization implement internal role separation.
- NET-10.1_A03 the systems that collectively provide name/address resolution services for an organization implement external role separation.