NET-14.4: Remote Privileged Commands & Sensitive Data Access
Mechanisms exist to restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs.
Control Question: Does the organization restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs?
General (16)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| GovRAMP Moderate | AC-17(04) |
| GovRAMP High | AC-17(04) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | AC-17(4) |
| NIST 800-171 R2 (source) | 3.1.15 |
| NIST 800-171A (source) | 3.1.15[a] 3.1.15[b] 3.1.15[c] 3.1.15[d] |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.01.12.d |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.01.12.d[1] A.03.01.12.d[2] |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | NET-14.4 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | NET-14.4 |
US (12)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CJIS Security Policy 5.9.3 (source) | AC-17(4) |
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) | AC.L2-3.1.15 |
| US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) | AC.L2-3.1.15 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R4 | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (moderate) | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | AC-17(4) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | AC-17(4) |
| US IRS 1075 | AC-17(4) |
| US - TX TX-RAMP Level 2 | AC-17(4) |
EMEA (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 4.17 4.20 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-35 |
| EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 | 2417 |
APAC (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 16.5.11.C.01 16.5.11.C.02 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.01.12.D |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
Network Security (NET) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- IT personnel use an informal process to design, build and maintain secure networks for test, development, staging and production environments, including the implementation of appropriate cybersecurity and data protection controls.
- Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Network monitoring is primarily reactive in nature.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Network Security (NET) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Network security management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for network security management.
- IT personnel define secure networking practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
- Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- Administrative processes are used to configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
- Administrative processes and technologies restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Network Security (NET) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Technology Infrastructure team, or similar function, defines centrally-managed network security controls for implementation across the enterprise.
- Secure engineering principles are used to design and implement network security controls (e.g., industry-recognized secure practices) to enforce the concepts of least privilege and least functionality at the network level.
- IT/cybersecurity architects work with the Technology Infrastructure team to implement a “layered defense” network architecture that provides a defense-in-depth approach for redundancy and risk reduction for network-based security controls, including wired and wireless networking.
- Administrative processes and technologies configure boundary devices (e.g., firewalls, routers, etc.) to deny network traffic by default and allow network traffic by exception (e.g., deny all, permit by exception).
- Technologies automate the Access Control Lists (ACLs) and similar rulesets review process to identify security issues and/ or misconfigurations.
- Network segmentation exists to implement separate network addresses (e.g., different subnets) to connect systems in different security domains (e.g., sensitive/regulated data environments).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to restrict the execution of privileged commands and access to security-relevant information via remote access only for compelling operational needs.
Assessment Objectives
- NET-14.4_A01 privileged commands authorized for remote execution are identified.
- NET-14.4_A02 security-relevant information authorized to be accessed remotely is identified.
- NET-14.4_A03 the execution of the identified privileged commands via remote access is authorized.
- NET-14.4_A04 access to the identified security-relevant information via remote access is authorized.
- NET-14.4_A05 the rationale for remote access is documented in the security plan for the system.
- NET-14.4_A06 remote execution of privileged commands is authorized.
- NET-14.4_A07 remote access to security-relevant information is authorized.