Skip to main content

OPS-04: Security Operations Center (SOC)

OPS 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to establish and maintain a Security Operations Center (SOC) that facilitates a 24x7 response capability.

Control Question: Does the organization establish and maintain a Security Operations Center (SOC) that facilitates a 24x7 response capability?

General (10)
Framework Mapping Values
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1005, T1025
NIST 800-53 R4 SC-38
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) IR-4(14) SC-38
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) IR-4(14) SC-38
NIST 800-161 R1 SC-38
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 SC-38
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 SC-38
NIST 800-172 3.6.1e
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) OPS-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats OPS-04
US (3)
Framework Mapping Values
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) IR.L3-3.6.1E
US DoD Zero Trust Execution Roadmap 6.7 7.3 7.5
US DHS ZTCF SEC-03
APAC (2)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC India SEBI CSCRF DE.CM.S1
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 12.2.1
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada CSAG 1.4

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to establish and maintain a Security Operations Center (SOC) that facilitates a 24x7 response capability.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to establish and maintain a Security Operations Center (SOC) that facilitates a 24x7 response capability.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Security operations (OPS) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Security operations management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for security operations.
  • Administrative processes focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • Critical business functions are documented in “run books” or Standardized Operating Procedures (SOPs) to capture operational knowledge in documentation form.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Security Operations (OPS) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Has a defined mission and expected functions. o Manages cybersecurity operations that covers preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication and recovery. o Configures monitoring technologies to implement the legally-allowable enhanced monitoring profiles for selected users and establish a reporting capability to designated personnel on enhanced monitoring activities. o Is capable of detecting and responding to potential incidents through a formalized intake of security-related tickets; log monitoring; and analyzing threat intelligence feeds. o Is staffed internally by qualified cybersecurity personnel, or is outsourced to a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP). o Maintains a documented knowledge management repository to assist in SOC operations. o Ensures personnel are assigned appropriate roles and responsibilities to assist Integrated Security Incident Response Team (ISIRT) personnel in incident response operations. o Responds to cybersecurity and data privacy incidents according to documented procedures.

  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function,
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Security Operations (OPS) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to establish and maintain a Security Operations Center (SOC) that facilitates a 24x7 response capability.

Assessment Objectives

  1. OPS-04_A01 a Security Operations Center (SOC) capability is established and maintained.
  2. OPS-04_A02 a time period to operate a Security Operations Center (SOC) capability is defined.
  3. OPS-04_A03 the Security Operations Center (SOC) capability operates according to an organization-defined time period.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Outsourced 24x7 Security Operations Center (SOC) through a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP).

Small

  • Outsourced 24x7 Security Operations Center (SOC) through a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP).

Medium

  • Outsourced 24x7 Security Operations Center (SOC) through a Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP).
  • Internal 8x5 staff augmentation

Large

  • In-house 24x7 Security Operations Center (SOC)

Enterprise

  • In-house 24x7 Security Operations Center (SOC)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.