Skip to main content

OPS-08: Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR)

OPS 5 — Medium Protect

Mechanisms exist to utilize Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) tools to define, prioritize and automate the response to security incidents.

Renumbered: Formerly OPS-06 in SCF 2025.4.

Control Question: Does the organization utilize Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) tools to define, prioritize and automate the response to security incidents?

US (5)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Germany C5 2026 OPS-13.02B.6
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada OSFI Self-Assessment Guidance 3.3.2

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

Practices are non-existent, based on the inability to demonstrate an implemented and operational capability. A reasonable person would conclude the control is not being performed.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Security Operations (OPS) domain capabilities are ad hoc and inconsistent. Capability criteria associated with this control may include: ▪ Policies, standards & procedures associated with OPS domain capabilities provide limited coverage due to the depth and breadth of the existing documentation. ▪ Cybersecurity operations-related activities are decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices. ▪ Cybersecurity operations are primarily viewed as additional duties for IT staff.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

SCR-CMM Level 2 criteria definitions are not available for this control: ▪ A reasonable person would conclude a well-defined and standardized process is required. ▪ At this level of maturity, the “requirements-driven” nature of performing the control is focused on a localized and/or regionalized implementation, not uniform and consistent across the organization. ▪ Requirements are narrowly scoped for applicability and are primarily derived from compliance obligations (e.g., laws, regulations and contracts).

Level 3 — Well Defined

Security Operations (OPS) capabilities are standardized across the entity for applicability to People, Processes, Technologies, Data and/or Facilities (PPTDF) to ensure consistency for Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD). Capability criteria associated with this control reasonably expect the following criteria to exist: ▪ Policies and standards associated with OPS domain capabilities are formally documented and centrally-managed by the entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function. ▪ Standardized Operating Procedures (SOP) associated with OPS domain capabilities are well-documented and kept current by process owners. ▪ A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function, is appropriately staffed and supported to implement and maintain OPS domain capabilities. ▪ Technology is leveraged to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of security operations management (e.g., SIEM solution and EDR/XDR tools). ▪ The entity's Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) team, or similar function, works with business stakeholders and process owners to appropriately scope and reasonably implement cybersecurity and data protection controls associated with OPS domain capabilities to address Minimum Compliance Requirements (MCR) (e.g., applicable statutory, regulatory and/or contractual requirements) and Discretionary Security Requirements (DSR) (e.g., entity-required controls). ▪ Cybersecurity personnel create “run books,” or SOPs, to capture operational knowledge in documentation form for critical business functions and/or for sensitive/regulated obligations. ▪ An implemented and operational capability exists to utilize Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) tools to define, prioritize and automate the response to security incidents.

Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ While it may be possible to develop “metrics-driven” capabilities for this control, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Utilize SCR-CMM Level 3 or Level 4 (if available) criteria definitions: ▪ There are no defined Level 5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to operationalize this control. ▪ Level 5 capabilities should be considered “world-class” where the control builds on Level 4 capabilities, but are continuously improving through Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) technologies. ▪ While it may be possible to develop responsive capabilities for this control through the use of AI and/or ML technologies, the criteria would be organization-specific to define.

Assessment Objectives

  1. OPS-08_A01 Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) tools are used to define, prioritize and automate responses to security incidents.

Evidence Requirements

E-OPS-01 Security Operations Center (SOC)

Documented evidence of a Security Operations Center (SOC).

Security Operations

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Centralized event logging
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Small

  • Centralized event logging
  • Security Incident Event Manager (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)

Medium

  • Centralized event logging
  • Security Incident Event Management (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
  • Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Large

  • Centralized event logging
  • Security Incident Event Management (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
  • Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Enterprise

  • Centralized event logging
  • Security Incident Event Management (SIEM)
  • Managed Security Services Provider (MSSP)
  • Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)
  • Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.