Skip to main content

PES-04.2: Searches

PES 1 — Low Detect

Physical access control mechanisms exist to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Control Question: Does the organization inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets?

General (1)
Framework Mapping Values
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 PS-2.0
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 8.1.12.C.01 8.1.13.C.01 8.1.13.C.02

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.

  • A physical security team, or similar function:
  • A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
  • Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
  • Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to inspect personnel and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Assessment Objectives

  1. PES-04.2_A01 physical security personnel inspect individuals and their personal effects (e.g., personal property ordinarily worn or carried by the individual, including vehicles) to prevent the unauthorized exfiltration of data and technology assets.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.