Skip to main content

PES-06.1: Distinguish Visitors from On-Site Personnel

PES 8 — High Protect

Physical access control mechanisms exist to easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.

Control Question: Does the organization easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible?

General (10)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.10.3
NIST 800-171A (source) 3.10.3[a] 3.10.3[b]
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.10.02.b 03.10.07.c
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.10.07.c[01] A.03.10.07.c[02]
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 9.3.2
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 9.3.2
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 9.3.2
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) PES-06.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure PES-06.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats PES-06.1
US (4)
Framework Mapping Values
US CMMC 2.0 Level 1 (source) PE.L1-B.1.IX
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) PE.L2-3.10.3
US CMMC 2.0 Level 3 (source) PE.L2-3.10.3
US FAR 52.204-21 52.204-21(b)(1)(ix)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-47
EMEA UK DEFSTAN 05-138 1503
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.10.02.B 03.10.07.C

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Physical access control is decentralized.
  • Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards), focusing on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs).
  • Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Physical access control is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for physical access control.
  • Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
  • Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards).
  • Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies are primarily designed and implemented for offices, rooms and facilities that focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
  • A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of automated physical and environmental protection controls.
  • Administrative processes, physical controls and technologies easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.

  • A physical security team, or similar function:
  • A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
  • Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
  • Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
  • Administrative processes, physical controls and technologies easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.
  • Administrative processes, physical controls and technologies identify, authorize and monitor visitors before allowing access to the facility (other than areas designated as publicly accessible).
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to easily distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive/regulated data is accessible.

Assessment Objectives

  1. PES-06.1_A01 physical access control mechanisms distinguish between onsite personnel and visitors, especially in areas where sensitive / regulated data is accessible.
  2. PES-06.1_A02 visitors are escorted.
  3. PES-06.1_A03 visitor activity is controlled.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Visible badges for visitors that are different from organizational personnel

Small

  • Visible badges for visitors that are different from organizational personnel

Medium

  • Visible badges for visitors that are different from organizational personnel

Large

  • Visible badges for visitors that are different from organizational personnel

Enterprise

  • Visible badges for visitors that are different from organizational personnel

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.