PES-08.3: Automatic Fire Suppression
Facility security mechanisms exist to employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.
Control Question: Does the organization employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis?
General (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| COBIT 2019 | DSS01.04 |
| GovRAMP Moderate | PE-13(02) |
| GovRAMP High | PE-13(02) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | PE-13(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (moderate) | PE-13(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R4 (high) | PE-13(3) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PE-13(2) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | PE-13(2) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | PE-13(2) |
US (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | PE-13(3) |
| US FedRAMP R4 | PE-13(3) |
| US FedRAMP R4 (high) | PE-13(3) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | PE-13(2) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | PE-13(2) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | PE-13(2) |
EMEA (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | PS-05 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Physical access control is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls that are appropriate to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for physical access control.
- Human Resources, or a similar function, maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and facilitates the implementation of physical access management controls.
- Physical security controls are primarily administrative in nature (e.g., policies & standards).
- Physical controls, administrative processes and technologies are primarily designed and implemented for offices, rooms and facilities that focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
- A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of automated physical and environmental protection controls.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.
- A physical security team, or similar function:
- A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
- Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
- Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to employ an automatic fire suppression capability for critical systems when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.
Assessment Objectives
- PES-08.3_A01 an automatic fire suppression capability is employed when the facility is not staffed on a continuous basis.