PES-17: Proximity Sensor

There is no evidence of a capability to monitor physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms to reduce applied force or stop the operation when sensors indicate a potentially dangerous scenario.

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to monitor physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms to reduce applied force or stop the operation when sensors indicate a potentially dangerous scenario.

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to monitor physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms to reduce applied force or stop the operation when sensors indicate a potentially dangerous scenario.

Physical & Environmental Security (PES) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Performs the centralized-management of physical security controls across the enterprise. o Maintains a current list of personnel with authorized access to organizational facilities and implements physical access management controls.

• A physical security team, or similar function:
• A facilities maintenance team, or similar function, manages the operation of environmental protection controls.
• Administrative processes exist to authorize physical access to facilities based on the position or role of the individual.
• Administrative processes and physical controls restrict unescorted access to facilities to personnel with required security clearances, formal access authorizations and validated the need for access.
• Physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms is continuously monitored to automatically change the operating state to reduce applied force or stop the operation when physical proximity sensors indicate a dangerous setting.

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to monitor physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms to reduce applied force or stop the operation when sensors indicate a potentially dangerous scenario.

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to monitor physical proximity to robotic or autonomous platforms to reduce applied force or stop the operation when sensors indicate a potentially dangerous scenario.