PRI-01.1: Chief Privacy Officer (CPO)
Mechanisms exist to appoints a Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) or similar role, with the authority, mission, accountability and resources to coordinate, develop and implement, applicable data privacy requirements and manage data privacy risks through the organization-wide data privacy program.
Control Question: Does the organization have a Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) or similar role, with the authority, mission, accountability and resources to coordinate, develop and implement, applicable data privacy requirements and manage data privacy risks through the organization-wide data privacy program?
General (13)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APEC Privacy Framework 2015 | 9 |
| Generally Accepted Privacy Principles (GAPP) | 1.1.0 1.1.2 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.8 1.2.9 2.1.0 4.2.3 8.2.1 |
| ISO 27018 2014 | A.10.11 A.10.12 |
| ISO 27701 2025 | 5.1 5.3 |
| ISO 29100 2024 | 6.10 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | GV.PO-P5 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | AR-1 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PM-19 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (privacy) (source) | PM-19 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | PM-19 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 | PM-19 |
| OECD Privacy Principles | 8 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | PRI-01.1 |
US (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | COMP:SG2.SP1 EF:SG2.SP1 EF:SG2.SP2 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | AR-1 |
| US FIPPS | 2 |
| US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) | 164.530(a)(1)(i) |
| US IRS 1075 | PM-19 |
| US - CO Colorado Privacy Act | 6-1-1308(1)(c)(I) 6-1-1308(1)(c)(II) 6-1-1308(6) |
EMEA (10)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA Germany | Sec 4d Sec 4f Sec 4g |
| EMEA Hungary | 24 |
| EMEA Ireland | 2 |
| EMEA Israel | 16 17 |
| EMEA Italy | 30 |
| EMEA Poland | 46 |
| EMEA Qatar PDPPL | 8.1 |
| EMEA Russia | 23 |
| EMEA South Africa | 55 56 |
| EMEA Sweden | 30 38 |
APAC (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC China Privacy Law | 9 52 |
| APAC Japan APPI | 21 |
| APAC Singapore | 11 |
| APAC South Korea | 31 |
Americas (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Argentina PPL | 10 |
| Americas Brazil LGPD | 6.8 6.10 |
| Americas Chile | 7 11 |
| Americas Colombia | 17 18 |
| Americas Costa Rica | 11 |
| Americas Uruguay | 12 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to appoint a Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) or similar role, with the authority, mission, accountability and resources to coordinate, develop and implement, applicable data privacy requirements and manage data privacy risks through the organization-wide data privacy program.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to appoint a Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) or similar role, with the authority, mission, accountability and resources to coordinate, develop and implement, applicable data privacy requirements and manage data privacy risks through the organization-wide data privacy program.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Privacy (PRI) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Privacy management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- The data privacy program is developed to work with IT and cybersecurity staff to ensure that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations for Personal Data (PD) are properly identified and implemented across the enterprise.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for data privacy management.
- A qualified individual is formally assigned as the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar role, to lead the organization's data privacy program. This individual may be assigned to multiple duties, including that as a Data Protection Officer (DPO).
- The CPO, or similar role, identifies “data privacy principles” that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to, based on leading data privacy practices.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Privacy (PRI) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar function with technical competence to address data privacy concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to develop and publish authoritative guidance on the organization's data privacy program.
- A Privacy program, run by a CPO, or similar role, ensures that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations are properly identified and implemented to limit and secure Personal Data (PD) that the organization stores, transmits and processes.
- As part of the organization's data privacy program, the CPO publishes a clear set of “data privacy principles”, based on leading data privacy practices, that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to.
- A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, ensures both cybersecurity and data privacy principles are identified and implemented within ongoing or planned projects.
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to data privacy.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program.
- Data/process owners operationalize data privacy controls into the processes they control.
- Third-party contracts included data protection requirements, including flow-down requirements to subcontractors.
- Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are assigned to work closely with business units and project teams to ensure data privacy principles are being implemented.
- CPO and DPO determine and document the legal authority that permits the collection, use, maintenance and sharing of PD, either generally or in support of a specific program or system need.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Privacy (PRI) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to appoint a Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) or similar role, with the authority, mission, accountability and resources to coordinate, develop and implement, applicable data privacy requirements and manage data privacy risks through the organization-wide data privacy program.
Assessment Objectives
- PRI-01.1_A01 a senior organization official for privacy with authority, mission, accountability and resources is appointed.
- PRI-01.1_A02 the senior organization official for privacy coordinates applicable privacy requirements.
- PRI-01.1_A03 the senior organization official for privacy develops applicable privacy requirements.
- PRI-01.1_A04 the senior organization official for privacy implements applicable privacy requirements.
- PRI-01.1_A05 the senior organization official for privacy manages privacy risks through the organization-wide privacy program.
Evidence Requirements
- E-HRS-08 Role Assignment - CPO
-
Documented evidence of a formal role assignment to the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) position.
Human Resources
Technology Recommendations
Medium
- Data privacy program
- Assigned Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) role
Large
- Assigned Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) role
Enterprise
- Assigned Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) role