PRI-05.2: Personal Data (PD) Accuracy & Integrity
Mechanisms exist to ensure the accuracy and relevance of Personal Data (PD) throughout the information lifecycle by: (1) Keeping PD up-to-date; and (2) Remediating identified inaccuracies, as necessary.
Control Question: Does the organization ensure the accuracy and relevance of Personal Data (PD) throughout the information lifecycle by: (1) Keeping PD up-to-date; and (2) Remediating identified inaccuracies, as necessary?
General (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APEC Privacy Framework 2015 | 6 |
| Generally Accepted Privacy Principles (GAPP) | 9.2.1 |
| ISO 29100 2024 | 6.7 |
| NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 | PR.DS-P6 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | DI-2 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | PM-24 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (privacy) (source) | PM-24 |
| Shared Assessments SIG 2025 | P.5.1 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | PRI-05.2 |
US (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CERT RMM 1.2 | COMP:SG2.SP3 EXD:SG3.SP4 KIM:SG5.SP3 |
| US CMS MARS-E 2.0 | DI-2 |
| US Data Privacy Framework (DPF) | II.5.a |
| US HHS 45 CFR 155.260 | 155.260(a)(3)(vi) 155.260(a)(3)(vi) |
EMEA (8)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU GDPR (source) | 5.1(d) |
| EMEA Kenya DPA 2019 | 25(f) |
| EMEA Netherlands | 11 |
| EMEA Norway | 11 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia PDPL | 14 |
| EMEA Serbia 87/2018 | 5.4 |
| EMEA South Africa | 14 16 |
| EMEA Spain 1720/2007 | 8 |
APAC (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia Privacy Act | APP Part 10 |
| APAC Australian Privacy Principles | APP 10 |
| APAC China Privacy Law | 8 |
| APAC India DPDPA 2023 | 8(3) 8(3)(a) 8(3)(b) |
| APAC Japan APPI | 19 |
| APAC Malaysia | 11 |
| APAC New Zealand Privacy Act of 2020 | Principle 9 |
| APAC Singapore | 23 |
| APAC South Korea | 3 |
Americas (8)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Argentina PPL | 4 |
| Americas Argentina Reg 132-2018 | 4.5 |
| Americas Bahamas | 6 |
| Americas Canada PIPEDA | Principle 6 |
| Americas Colombia | 4 |
| Americas Costa Rica | 6 |
| Americas Mexico | 9 |
| Americas Peru | 8 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to ensure the accuracy and relevance of Personal Data (PD) throughout the information lifecycle by: (1) Keeping PD up-to-date; and (2) Remediating identified inaccuracies, as necessary.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to ensure the accuracy and relevance of Personal Data (PD) throughout the information lifecycle by: (1) Keeping PD up-to-date; and (2) Remediating identified inaccuracies, as necessary.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Privacy (PRI) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Privacy management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- The data privacy program is developed to work with IT and cybersecurity staff to ensure that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations for Personal Data (PD) are properly identified and implemented across the enterprise.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for data privacy management.
- A qualified individual is formally assigned as the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar role, to lead the organization's data privacy program. This individual may be assigned to multiple duties, including that as a Data Protection Officer (DPO).
- The CPO, or similar role, identifies “data privacy principles” that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to, based on leading data privacy practices.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Privacy (PRI) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- A Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar function with technical competence to address data privacy concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to develop and publish authoritative guidance on the organization's data privacy program.
- A Privacy program, run by a CPO, or similar role, ensures that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations are properly identified and implemented to limit and secure Personal Data (PD) that the organization stores, transmits and processes.
- As part of the organization's data privacy program, the CPO publishes a clear set of “data privacy principles”, based on leading data privacy practices, that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to.
- A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, ensures both cybersecurity and data privacy principles are identified and implemented within ongoing or planned projects.
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to data privacy.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program.
- Data/process owners operationalize data privacy controls into the processes they control.
- Third-party contracts included data protection requirements, including flow-down requirements to subcontractors.
- Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are assigned to work closely with business units and project teams to ensure data privacy principles are being implemented.
- CPO and DPO determine and document the legal authority that permits the collection, use, maintenance and sharing of PD, either generally or in support of a specific program or system need.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Privacy (PRI) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure the accuracy and relevance of Personal Data (PD) throughout the information lifecycle by: (1) Keeping PD up-to-date; and (2) Remediating identified inaccuracies, as necessary.
Assessment Objectives
- PRI-05.2_A01 a data integrity board/function is established.
- PRI-05.2_A02 the data integrity board/function reviews proposals to conduct or participate in a matching program.
- PRI-05.2_A03 the data integrity board/function conducts an annual review of all matching programs in which the agency has participated.
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Small
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Medium
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Large
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management
Enterprise
- Data classification program
- Data privacy program
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
- Product / project management