Skip to main content

PRI-06.1: Correcting Inaccurate Personal Data (PD)

PRI 5 — Medium Respond

Mechanisms exist to maintain a process for: (1) Data subjects to have inaccurate Personal Data (PD) maintained by the organization corrected or amended; and (2) Disseminating corrections or amendments of PD to other authorized users of the PD.

Control Question: Does the organization maintain a process for: (1) Data subjects to have inaccurate Personal Data (PD) maintained by the organization corrected or amended; and (2) Disseminating corrections or amendments of PD to other authorized users of the PD?

General (10)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) P5.2 P5.2-POF2
APEC Privacy Framework 2015 8(c)
Generally Accepted Privacy Principles (GAPP) 6.2.5 6.2.6 10.2.1 10.2.2
ISO 29100 2024 6.9
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 CM.AW-P8 CT.DM-P3
NIST 800-53 R4 IP-3
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SI-18(4) SI-18(5)
NIST 800-53B R5 (privacy) (source) SI-18(4)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SI-18(5)
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) PRI-06.1
US (11)
Framework Mapping Values
US CERT RMM 1.2 COMM:SG1.SP3 KIM:SG5.SP1
US CMS MARS-E 2.0 IP-3
US Data Privacy Framework (DPF) II.6.a
US FIPPS 1
US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) 164.526(a)(1) 164.526(a)(2) 164.526(a)(2)(i) 164.526(a)(2)(ii) 164.526(a)(2)(iii) 164.526(a)(2)(iv) 164.526(b)(1)
US - CA CCPA 2025 7023(a) 7023(b) 7023(d)(1) 7023(d)(2)
US - CO Colorado Privacy Act 6-1-1306(1)(c)
US - OR CPA 3(1)(b)
US - TN TIPA 47-18-3203(a)(2)(B)
US - TX CDPA 541.051(b)(2)
US - VA CDPA 2025 59.1-577.A.2
EMEA (19)
APAC (14)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia Privacy Act APP Part 13
APAC Australian Privacy Principles APP 13
APAC China Cybersecurity Law 43
APAC China DNSIP 8
APAC China Privacy Law 46 49
APAC Hong Kong Sec 22
APAC India DPDPA 2023 12(1) 12(2)(a) 12(2)(b)
APAC Japan APPI 26(1) 26(1)(i) 26(1)(ii) 29(1) 29(2) 29(3)
APAC Malaysia 34
APAC New Zealand Privacy Act of 2020 P6-(2) Principle 7 P7-(1) P7-(2) P7-(3)(a) P7-(3)(b) P7-(4) P7-(5) P7-(6)
APAC Philippines 34
APAC Singapore 22
APAC South Korea 4 36
APAC Taiwan 3
Americas (11)

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to ensure: (1) Data subjects to have inaccurate Personal Data (PD) maintained by the organization corrected or amended; and (2) Disseminating corrections or amendments of PD to other authorized users of the PD.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to maintain a process for: (1) Data subjects to have inaccurate Personal Data (PD) maintained by the organization corrected or amended; and (2) Disseminating corrections or amendments of PD to other authorized users of the PD.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Privacy (PRI) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Privacy management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • The data privacy program is developed to work with IT and cybersecurity staff to ensure that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations for Personal Data (PD) are properly identified and implemented across the enterprise.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for data privacy management.
  • A qualified individual is formally assigned as the Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar role, to lead the organization's data privacy program. This individual may be assigned to multiple duties, including that as a Data Protection Officer (DPO).
  • The CPO, or similar role, identifies “data privacy principles” that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to, based on leading data privacy practices.
  • Administrative processes exist for data subjects to have inaccurate PD maintained by the organization corrected or amended.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Privacy (PRI) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • A Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), or similar function with technical competence to address data privacy concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to develop and publish authoritative guidance on the organization's data privacy program.
  • A Privacy program, run by a CPO, or similar role, ensures that applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual data privacy obligations are properly identified and implemented to limit and secure Personal Data (PD) that the organization stores, transmits and processes.
  • As part of the organization's data privacy program, the CPO publishes a clear set of “data privacy principles”, based on leading data privacy practices, that systems, applications, services, processes and third-parties must adhere to.
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, ensures both cybersecurity and data privacy principles are identified and implemented within ongoing or planned projects.
  • The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns, analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
  • The CISO, or similar function, develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for cybersecurity-related data privacy practices.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function, provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to data privacy.
  • A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program.
  • Data/process owners operationalize data privacy controls into the processes they control.
  • Third-party contracts included data protection requirements, including flow-down requirements to subcontractors.
  • Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are assigned to work closely with business units and project teams to ensure data privacy principles are being implemented.
  • CPO and DPO determine and document the legal authority that permits the collection, use, maintenance and sharing of PD, either generally or in support of a specific program or system need.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Privacy (PRI) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to maintain a process for: (1) Data subjects to have inaccurate Personal Data (PD) maintained by the organization corrected or amended; and (2) Disseminating corrections or amendments of PD to other authorized users of the PD.

Assessment Objectives

  1. PRI-06.1_A01 recipients of Personal Data (PD) to be notified when the Personal Data (PD) has been corrected or deleted are defined.
  2. PRI-06.1_A02 recipients and individuals are notified when the Personal Data (PD) has been corrected or deleted.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Data classification program
  • Data privacy program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
  • Product / project management

Small

  • Data classification program
  • Data privacy program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
  • Product / project management

Medium

  • Data classification program
  • Data privacy program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
  • Product / project management

Large

  • Data classification program
  • Data privacy program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
  • Product / project management

Enterprise

  • Data classification program
  • Data privacy program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)
  • Product / project management

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.