Skip to main content

RSK-01.2: Risk Management Resourcing

RSK 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Control Question: Does the organization reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks?

General (2)
Framework Mapping Values
ISO 42001 2023 5.1
NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 GOVERN 1.3 GOVERN 1.4 MANAGE 2.1
US (1)
Framework Mapping Values
US FCA CRM 609.930(a)
EMEA (1)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 2.1.2(e)

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Risk Management efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for Risk Management (RM) practices. o Develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for RM. o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to RM. o Maintains a common taxonomy of risk-relevant terminology to minimize assumptions and misunderstandings. o Enables data/process owners to conduct annual risk assessment of their operations that includes the likelihood and magnitude of harm, from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification or destruction of the organization's systems and data. o Assists users in making informed risk decisions to ensure data and processes are appropriately protected. o Enables the documentation of risk assessments, risk response and risk monitoring to support statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations for risk management practices. o Maintains a centralized risk register to reflect an active recording and disposition of identified risks. The risk register identifies and assigns a risk ranking to vulnerabilities and risks that is based on industry-recognized practices and facilitates monitoring and reporting of those risks. o Governs supply chain risks associated with the development, acquisition, maintenance and disposal of systems, system components and services.

  • A formal Risk Management Program (RMP) provides enterprise-wide guidance on how risk is to be identified, framed (e.g., risk appetite, risk tolerance, risk thresholds, etc.) assessed, mitigated/remediated and reported.
  • Criteria to define materiality for risk management decisions is defined.
  • A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program, including appropriately resourcing risk management operations.
  • A formally-documented Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) plan exists to identify, assess and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats;
  • The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns,
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function:
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes assets according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes, applying the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts by resourcing the capability required to manage technology-related risks.

Assessment Objectives

  1. RSK-01.2_A01 an executive steering committee, or advisory board, identifies necessary resourcing for the capability required to manage technology-related risks.
  2. RSK-01.2_A02 the organization's incident response capability is resourced accordingly so it can reduce the magnitude or likelihood of potential impacts from technology-related risks.
  3. RSK-01.2_A03 recurring reviews of incident response operations are used to benchmark resourcing requirements for incident response operations.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Risk Management Program (RMP)

Small

  • Risk Management Program (RMP)

Medium

  • Risk Management Program (RMP)

Large

  • Risk Management Program (RMP)

Enterprise

  • Risk Management Program (RMP)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.