RSK-06.2: Compensating Countermeasures
Mechanisms exist to identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Control Question: Does the organization identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats?
General (23)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC9.1-POF1 CC9.1-POF2 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 2.2 |
| IEC TR 60601-4-5 2021 | 4.3 5.2 |
| IEC 62443-4-2 2019 | CCSC 2 (4.3) |
| ISO/SAE 21434 2021 | PM-06-13 RQ-06-14 |
| ISO 27701 2025 | 6.1.3 |
| ISO 42001 2023 | 6.1.3(b) 6.1.3(c) 6.1.3(d) 8.3 |
| MPA Content Security Program 5.1 | OR-2.0 |
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | MANAGE 2.1 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.11.02.b |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | GV.RM-04 ID.RA-06 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 1.2.6 2.2.4 12.3.1 12.3.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 1.2.6 2.2.4 12.3.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) | 1.2.6 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 2.2.4 12.3.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) | 2.2.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 1.2.6 2.2.4 12.3.1 12.3.2 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 1.2.6 2.2.4 12.3.1 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | RSK-06.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | RSK-06.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | RSK-06.2 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | RSK-06.2 |
| SCF CORE AI Model Deployment | RSK-06.2 |
US (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US CISA CPG 2022 | 1.E |
| US DHS ZTCF | DEV-05 |
| US FCA CRM | 609.930(a) |
| US GLBA CFR 314 2023 (source) | 314.4(c)(2) |
| US HIPAA Administrative Simplification 2013 (source) | 164.306(d)(3)(ii)(B)(2) |
| US HIPAA Security Rule / NIST SP 800-66 R2 (source) | 164.306(d)(3)(ii)(B)(2) |
| US TSA / DHS 1580/82-2022-01 | III.C.1.b III.C.2 III.C.3 III.E.3 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7002(d)(3) |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.12(b) 500.15(b) 500.9(b)(3) |
EMEA (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU AI Act | 9.5(b) |
| EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 | 3.3.1(13)(c) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 6.6.1(d) |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 1-3-1-6 1-3-1-7 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 | TPC-31 |
| EMEA South Africa | 19 |
APAC (6)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1809 |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | EV.ST.S1 EV.ST.S4 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HHSP26 HHSP43 HHSP65 HML26 HML43 HML64 |
| APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 | 12.4.5.C.01 |
| APAC Singapore Cyber Hygiene Practice | 4.2(b) 4.3(c) |
| APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 | 4.2.1 4.4.2 4.4.3 |
Americas (4)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Bermuda BMACCC | 5.8 |
| Americas Canada CSAG | 6.16 6.24 |
| Americas Canada OSFI B-13 | 3.2.6 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.11.02.B |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Risk Management efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for risk management. o Implement and maintain a form of Risk Management Program (RMP) that provides operational guidance on how risk is identified, assessed, remediated and reported.
- Risk management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- Data/process owners are expected to self-manage risks associated with their systems, applications, services and data, based on the organization's published policies and standards, including the identification, remediation and reporting of risks.
- Data/process owners work with IT/cybersecurity personnel and Data Protection Officers (DPOs) to ensure applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations are properly addressed, including the storage, transmission and processing of sensitive/regulated data.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel:
- Risk management processes (e.g., risk assessments) and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
Level 3 — Well Defined
Risk Management efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Analyzes the organization's business strategy to determine prioritized and authoritative guidance for Risk Management (RM) practices. o Develops a security-focused Concept of Operations (CONOPS) that documents management, operational and technical measures to apply defense-in-depth techniques across the enterprise for RM. o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to RM. o Maintains a common taxonomy of risk-relevant terminology to minimize assumptions and misunderstandings. o Enables data/process owners to conduct annual risk assessment of their operations that includes the likelihood and magnitude of harm, from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification or destruction of the organization's systems and data. o Assists users in making informed risk decisions to ensure data and processes are appropriately protected. o Enables the documentation of risk assessments, risk response and risk monitoring to support statutory, regulatory and contractual obligations for risk management practices. o Maintains a centralized risk register to reflect an active recording and disposition of identified risks. The risk register identifies and assigns a risk ranking to vulnerabilities and risks that is based on industry-recognized practices and facilitates monitoring and reporting of those risks. o Governs supply chain risks associated with the development, acquisition, maintenance and disposal of systems, system components and services.
- A formal Risk Management Program (RMP) provides enterprise-wide guidance on how risk is to be identified, framed (e.g., risk appetite, risk tolerance, risk thresholds, etc.) assessed, mitigated/remediated and reported.
- Criteria to define materiality for risk management decisions is defined.
- A steering committee is formally established to provide executive oversight of the cybersecurity and data privacy program, including appropriately resourcing risk management operations.
- A formally-documented Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) plan exists to identify, assess and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats;
- The Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), or similar function with technical competence to address cybersecurity concerns,
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function:
- An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes assets according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes, applying the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Assessment Objectives
- RSK-06.2_A01 identify and implement compensating countermeasures to reduce risk and exposure to threats.
Evidence Requirements
- E-RSK-03 Plan of Actions & Milestones (POA&M) / Risk Register
-
Documented evidence of a POA&M, or risk register, that tracks control deficiencies from identification through remediation.
Risk Management
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Risk Management Program (RMP)
Small
- Risk Management Program (RMP)
Medium
- Risk Management Program (RMP)
Large
- Risk Management Program (RMP)
Enterprise
- Risk Management Program (RMP)