Skip to main content

TDA-02.4: Pre-Established Secure Configurations

TDA 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to ensure vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade.

Control Question: Does the organization ensure vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade?

General (10)
Framework Mapping Values
IEC 62443-4-2 2019 CR 7.6 (11.8.1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SA-4(5)
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) SA-4(5)
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay SA-4(5)
NIST 800-161 R1 SA-4(5)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 SA-4(5)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.16.01
NIST 800-218 PW.4 PW.5.1 PW.9.1 PW.9.2
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure TDA-02.4
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats TDA-02.4
US (6)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 ARCHITECTURE-4.C.MIL2
US DHS CISA SSDAF 1.e
US EO 14028 4e(i)(E)
US FedRAMP R5 (source) SA-4(5)
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) SA-4(5)
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(14)
EMEA (2)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU Cyber Resiliency Act Annexes Annex 1.1(3)(a)
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.6.2(69)
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1798
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.16.01

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to ensure software vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to ensure software vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Development and acquisition management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for technology development and acquisition management.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel implement secure practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Secure development practices mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • Procurement practices require third-party developers of systems, system components or services to follow secure engineering practices.
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables the implementation of cybersecurity and data privacy-related resource planning controls across the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data for technology development and acquisition. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats.

  • Secure development practices conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • A procurement team, or similar function, ensures that third party development and/ or acquisitions meet, or exceed, the organization's business, cybersecurity and data privacy requirements to have secure and resilient systems, applications, services and processes.
  • A Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) governs a secure development lifecycle for the development of systems, applications and services.
  • Administrative processes exist and technologies are configured to implement secure configuration settings by default to reduce the likelihood of software being deployed with weak security settings, putting the asset at a greater risk of compromise.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
  • A formal Change Management (CM) program help to ensure that no unauthorized changes are made, all changes are documented, services are not disrupted and resources are used efficiently.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables IAP pre-production testing of cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of the organization's established project management processes.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to ensure software vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to ensure software vendors / manufacturers: (1) Deliver the Technology Asset, Application and/or Service (TAAS) with a pre-established, secure configuration implemented; and (2) Use the pre-established, secure configuration as the default for any subsequent TAAS reinstallation or upgrade.

Assessment Objectives

  1. TDA-02.4_A01 pre-established security configurations for the system, component or service are defined.
  2. TDA-02.4_A02 the developer of the system, system component or system service is required to deliver the system, component or service with pre-established security configurations implemented.
  3. TDA-02.4_A03 the pre-established configurations are used as the default for any subsequent system, component or service reinstallation or upgrade.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Defined "secure engineering principles" (e.g., alignment with NIST 800-160)
  • Product / project management

Small

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Defined "secure engineering principles" (e.g., alignment with NIST 800-160)
  • Product / project management

Medium

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Defined "secure engineering principles" (e.g., alignment with NIST 800-160)
  • Product / project management

Large

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Defined "secure engineering principles" (e.g., alignment with NIST 800-160)
  • Product / project management
  • System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) governance / oversight

Enterprise

  • Secure Baseline Configurations (SBC)
  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Defined "secure engineering principles" (e.g., alignment with NIST 800-160)
  • Product / project management
  • System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) governance / oversight

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.