Skip to main content

TDA-07: Secure Development Environments

TDA 9 — Critical Protect

Mechanisms exist to maintain a segmented development network to ensure a secure development environment.

Control Question: Does the organization maintain a segmented development network to ensure a secure development environment?

General (23)
Framework Mapping Values
CIS CSC 8.1 16.8
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 16.8
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 16.8
CSA CCM 4 AIS-06 IVS-05
ISO/SAE 21434 2021 RC-05-15
ISO 27002 2022 8.25 8.31
ISO 27017 2015 14.2.1 14.2.6
MPA Content Security Program 5.1 TS-1.0 TS-2.5
NIST AI 600-1 MS-2.3-004
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 PR.DS-P7
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SA-3(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SA-3(1)
NIST 800-218 PO.5 PO.5.1
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 6.5.3 11.4.5 11.4.6
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 11.4.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) 11.4.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 11.4.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 6.5.3 11.4.5
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 6.5.3 11.4.5 11.4.6
SPARTA CM0004
UN R155 7.3.5
UN ECE WP.29 7.3.5
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) TDA-07
US (4)
Framework Mapping Values
US DHS CISA SSDAF 1 1.a
US DHS ZTCF DEV-03
US EO 14028 4e(i) 4e(i)(A)
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(14)
EMEA (7)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 3.6.2(69) 3.6.2(72)
EMEA EU NIS2 Annex 6.2.2(c) 6.8.2(h)
EMEA Germany C5 2020 DEV-02 DEV-10
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 10.1
EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 1-3-2-4
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 1-4-1-4
EMEA Saudi Arabia SACS-002 TPC-73
APAC (4)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-0400 ISM-1419
APAC Japan ISMAP 14.2.1 14.2.1.13.PB 14.2.6
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 14.4.4.C.01
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 5.7.3

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to maintain a segmented development network to ensure a secure development environment.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are ad hoc and inconsistent. CMM Level 1 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • IT personnel use an informal process to govern technology development and acquisition.
  • Secure development practices loosely conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • IT personnel work with data/process owners to help ensure secure practices are implemented throughout the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Development and acquisition management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for technology development and acquisition management.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel implement secure practices to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's technology assets, data and network(s).
  • Secure development practices mostly conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • Procurement practices require third-party developers of systems, system components or services to follow secure engineering practices.
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables the implementation of cybersecurity and data privacy-related resource planning controls across the System Development Lifecycle (SDLC) for all high-value projects.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects manage separate development, testing and operational environments to reduce the risks of unauthorized access or changes to the operational environment and to ensure no impact to production systems.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data for technology development and acquisition. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats.

  • Secure development practices conform to industry-recognized standards for secure engineering (e.g., OWASP, NIST SP 800-218, NIST SP 800-160, etc.).
  • A procurement team, or similar function, ensures that third party development and/ or acquisitions meet, or exceed, the organization's business, cybersecurity and data privacy requirements to have secure and resilient systems, applications, services and processes.
  • A Software Assurance Maturity Model (SAMM) governs a secure development lifecycle for the development of systems, applications and services.
  • Administrative processes exist and technologies are configured to implement secure configuration settings by default to reduce the likelihood of software being deployed with weak security settings, putting the asset at a greater risk of compromise.
  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
  • A formal Change Management (CM) program help to ensure that no unauthorized changes are made, all changes are documented, services are not disrupted and resources are used efficiently.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A Project Management Office (PMO), or project management function, enables IAP pre-production testing of cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of the organization's established project management processes.
  • IT/cybersecurity architects manage separate development, testing and operational environments to reduce the risks of unauthorized access or changes to the operational environment and to ensure no impact to production systems.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Technology Development & Acquisition (TDA) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. TDA-07_A01 system pre-production environments are protected commensurate with risk throughout the system development life cycle for the system, system component or system service.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.