TPM-01.1: Third-Party Inventories
Mechanisms exist to maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of the organization's Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
Control Question: Does the organization maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of its Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD)?
General (31)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC2.1-POF6 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 15.1 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG1 | 15.1 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 | 15.1 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 15.1 |
| IMO Maritime Cyber Risk Management | 3.5.3.8 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.19 |
| NIST AI 600-1 | GV-6.1-007 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | SR-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | SR-13 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | SR-13 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.07.06.a |
| NIST 800-207 | NIST Tenet 1 |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | GV.SC-04 GV.SC-07 GV.SC-08 ID.AM ID.AM-01 ID.AM-02 ID.AM-04 ID.RA-10 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 12.8 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 12.8.1 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ P2PE (source) | 12.8.1 |
| UN R155 | 7.2.2.5 |
| UN ECE WP.29 | 7.2.2.5 |
| SCF CORE Fundamentals | TPM-01.1 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | TPM-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | TPM-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | TPM-01.1 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | TPM-01.1 |
US (7)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | THIRD-PARTIES-1.B.MIL1 |
| US CISA CPG 2022 | 1.A 1.G 1.H |
| US DFARS Cybersecurity 252.204-70xx | 252.204-7018(c) |
| US DHS ZTCF | APP-01 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7024(l) 7123(c)(15) |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.11(a)(1) |
| US - VA CDPA 2025 | 59.1-578.C.5 |
EMEA (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU DORA | 28.1 28.1(a) 28.1(b) 28.1(b)(i) 28.1(b)(ii) 28.2 28.3 28.4(a) 28.4(b) 28.4(c) 28.4(d) 28.4(e) 28.5 28.6 28.7(a) 28.7(b) 28.7(c) 28.7(d) 28.8 28.8(a) 28.8(b) 28.8(c) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 | 21.3 |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 5.2 5.2(a) |
APAC (3)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1631 ISM-1637 ISM-1638 ISM-1736 ISM-1737 ISM-1786 |
| APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS230 | 49 |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | GV.OC.S3 GV.SC.S1 GV.SC.S2 |
Americas (1)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.07.06.A |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of its Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of its Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Require TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Contain "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data privacy practices deficiency(ies).
- Third-party management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for third-party management.
- A procurement function maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment.
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
- Procurement contracts:
Level 3 — Well Defined
Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to third-party management. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats. o Evaluates risks associated with weaknesses or deficiencies in supply chain elements identified during first and/ or third-party reviews. o Enables the implementation of third-party management controls. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment. o Requires TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Includes "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data privacy practices deficiency(ies). o Controls changes to services by suppliers, taking into account the criticality of business information, systems and processes that are in scope by the third-party. o Requires a risk assessment prior to the acquisition or outsourcing of technology-related services. o Monitors, regularly reviews and audits supplier service delivery for compliance with established contract agreements. o Uses tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique systems, system components or services.
- Procurement contracts and layered defenses provide safeguards to limit harm from potential adversaries who identify and target the organization's supply chain.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
- A procurement team, or similar function:
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of its Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to maintain a current, accurate and complete list of External Service Providers (ESPs) that can potentially impact the Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of its Technology Assets, Applications, Services and/or Data (TAASD).
Assessment Objectives
- TPM-01.1_A01 a current, accurate and complete list of Third-Party Service Providers (TSP) that can potentially impact the Sensitivity, Integrity, Availability and/or Safety (CIAS) of the organization's systems, applications, services and data is maintained.
Evidence Requirements
- E-AST-06 Asset Inventories - Cloud Service Provider (CSP)
-
Documented evidence of an inventory of the organization's cloud-based services (e.g., SaaS, IaaS, PaaS, etc.).
Asset Management - E-DCH-06 Third-Party Inventories
-
Documented evidence of an inventory of Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), contractors, vendors, etc. that directly or indirectly impact the organization's data, systems, applications, services and/or processes.
Data Protection
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Small
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Medium
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Large
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Enterprise
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program