Skip to main content

TPM-03.1: Acquisition Strategies, Tools & Methods

TPM 9 — Critical Identify

Mechanisms exist to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Control Question: Does the organization utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS)?

General (27)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC3.3 CC9.1
COSO 2017 Principle 8
CSA CCM 4 STA-05
ISO 27002 2022 5.21 5.22
MITRE ATT&CK 10 T1059.002, T1204.003, T1505, T1505.001, T1505.002, T1505.004, T1546.006, T1554, T1601, T1601.001, T1601.002
NIST 800-53 R4 SA-12(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SR-5 SR-3(1)
NIST 800-53B R5 (low) (source) SR-5
NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) SR-5
NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) SR-5
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SR-3(1)
NIST 800-82 R3 LOW OT Overlay SR-5
NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay SR-5
NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay SR-5
NIST 800-161 R1 SR-3(1) SR-5
NIST 800-161 R1 C-SCRM Baseline SR-5
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 1 SR-5
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 SR-5 SR-3(1)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 SR-5 SR-3(1)
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.17.01.a 03.17.02 03.17.03.a 03.17.03.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.17.02[01] A.03.17.02[02] A.03.17.02[03]
SPARTA CM0027
UN R155 7.2.2.5
UN ECE WP.29 7.2.2.5
SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational TPM-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure TPM-03.1
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats TPM-03.1
US (9)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 THIRD-PARTIES-1.E.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.A.MIL1 THIRD-PARTIES-2.B.MIL1 THIRD-PARTIES-2.C.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.D.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.E.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.F.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.G.MIL2 THIRD-PARTIES-2.H.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-2.I.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-2.J.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-2.K.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-2.L.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-2.M.MIL3
US CISA CPG 2022 1.I
US FedRAMP R5 (source) SR-5
US FedRAMP R5 (low) (source) SR-5
US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) SR-5
US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) SR-5
US FedRAMP R5 (LI-SaaS) (source) SR-5
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 9.L.C
US - TX DIR Control Standards 2.0 SR-5
EMEA (7)
APAC (1)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1567 ISM-1568 ISM-1632 ISM-1743 ISM-1788 ISM-1789
Americas (1)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.17.01.A 03.17.02 03.17.03.A 03.17.03.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Require TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Contain "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data privacy practices deficiency(ies).

  • Third-party management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for third-party management.
  • A procurement function maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment.
  • A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
  • Procurement contracts:
Level 3 — Well Defined

Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to third-party management. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats. o Evaluates risks associated with weaknesses or deficiencies in supply chain elements identified during first and/ or third-party reviews. o Enables the implementation of third-party management controls. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment. o Requires TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Includes "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data privacy practices deficiency(ies). o Controls changes to services by suppliers, taking into account the criticality of business information, systems and processes that are in scope by the third-party. o Requires a risk assessment prior to the acquisition or outsourcing of technology-related services. o Monitors, regularly reviews and audits supplier service delivery for compliance with established contract agreements. o Uses tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

  • Procurement contracts and layered defenses provide safeguards to limit harm from potential adversaries who identify and target the organization's supply chain.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
  • A procurement team, or similar function:
  • A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to utilize tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique Technology Assets, Applications and/or Services (TAAS).

Assessment Objectives

  1. TPM-03.1_A01 acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods to protect against, identify and mitigate supply chain risks are defined.
  2. TPM-03.1_A02 acquisition strategies, contract tools, and procurement method protect against, identify and mitigate supply chain risks are developed.
  3. TPM-03.1_A03 acquisition strategies, contract tools, and procurement methods are developed to identify supply chain risks.
  4. TPM-03.1_A04 acquisition strategies, contract tools, and procurement methods are developed to protect against supply chain risks.
  5. TPM-03.1_A05 acquisition strategies, contract tools, and procurement methods are developed to mitigate supply chain risks.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Small

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Medium

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Large

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

Enterprise

  • Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
  • Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.