TPM-08: Review of Third-Party Services
Mechanisms exist to monitor, regularly review and assess External Service Providers (ESPs) for compliance with established contractual requirements for cybersecurity and data protection controls.
Control Question: Does the organization monitor, regularly review and audit External Service Providers (ESPs) for compliance with established contractual requirements for cybersecurity and data protection controls?
General (47)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) | CC1.4-POF2 CC1.4-POF3 CC3.4 CC3.4-POF5 CC9.1 CC9.2-POF12 CC9.2-POF13 CC9.2-POF6 CC9.2-POF7 CC9.2-POF8 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 | 15 15.6 |
| CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 | 15.6 |
| COBIT 2019 | APO09.03 APO09.04 APO09.05 APO10.05 |
| COSO 2017 | Principle 9 |
| CSA CCM 4 | STA-05 STA-07 STA-10 STA-11 STA-13 UEM-14 |
| CSA IoT SCF 2 | POL-02 |
| ENISA 2.0 | SO4 |
| ISO 27002 2022 | 5.19 5.20 5.22 8.21 |
| ISO 27017 2015 | 13.1.2 15.2.1 |
| MITRE ATT&CK 10 | T1059.002, T1078, T1204.003, T1505, T1505.001, T1505.002, T1505.004, T1546.006, T1554, T1601, T1601.001, T1601.002 |
| NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) | 4.G |
| NIST AI 100-1 (AI RMF) 1.0 | MANAGE 3.0 MANAGE 3.1 |
| NIST 800-53 R4 | SA-12(2) |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (source) | SR-6 SR-6(1) |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (moderate) (source) | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-53B R5 (high) (source) | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) | SR-6(1) |
| NIST 800-82 R3 MODERATE OT Overlay | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-82 R3 HIGH OT Overlay | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 | SR-6 |
| NIST 800-171 R3 (source) | 03.16.03.c 03.17.02 |
| NIST 800-171A R3 (source) | A.03.16.03.c |
| NIST CSF 2.0 (source) | GV.SC-07 ID.IM-01 ID.IM-02 |
| OWASP Top 10 2021 | A02:2021 A05:2021 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) | 12.4.2 12.4.2.1 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) | 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) | 12.4.2 12.4.2.1 12.8.4 |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ P2PE (source) | 12.8.4 |
| SWIFT CSF 2023 | 2.8A |
| TISAX ISA 6 | 6.1.1 |
| UL 2900-1 2017 | 12.1 |
| UN R155 | 7.2.2.5 |
| UN ECE WP.29 | 7.2.2.5 |
| SCF CORE Fundamentals | TPM-08 |
| SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) | TPM-08 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 1 Foundational | TPM-08 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure | TPM-08 |
| SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats | TPM-08 |
US (12)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| US C2M2 2.1 | RISK-2.J.MIL3 THIRD-PARTIES-1.F.MIL3 |
| US CISA CPG 2022 | 1.H |
| US FCA CRM | 609.930(c)(5)(ii) 609.930(c)(5)(iv) |
| US FedRAMP R5 (source) | SR-6 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (moderate) (source) | SR-6 |
| US FedRAMP R5 (high) (source) | SR-6 |
| US GLBA CFR 314 2023 (source) | 314.4(f)(3) |
| US HIPAA HICP Large Practice | 9.L.C |
| US IRS 1075 | 2.C.10 SR-6 |
| US - CA CCPA 2025 | 7051(c) 7053(b) 7123(c)(15) |
| US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 | 500.11(a)(3) 500.11(a)(4) |
| US - VT Act 171 of 2018 | 2447(b)(6) 2447(b)(6)(A) 2447(b)(6)(B) |
EMEA (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| EMEA EU EBA GL/2019/04 | 3.2.3(9) |
| EMEA EU DORA | 28.6 30.3(e) |
| EMEA EU NIS2 | 21.3 |
| EMEA EU NIS2 Annex | 5.1.7(a) 5.1.7(b) 5.1.7(c) |
| EMEA Germany C5 2020 | SSO-04 SSO-05 |
| EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 | 11.4 11.5 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia IoT CGIoT-1 2024 | 4-1-6 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 | 4-1-1-4 |
| EMEA Saudi Arabia PDPL | 8 |
APAC (9)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| APAC Australia ISM June 2024 | ISM-1793 |
| APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS230 | 58(a) 58(b) 58(c) |
| APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS234 | 28 |
| APAC India SEBI CSCRF | GV.SC.S4 |
| APAC Japan APPI | 24(3) |
| APAC Japan ISMAP | 13.1.2 15.2.1 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF 2022 | HHSP25 HHSP73 HML25 HML73 HMS04 HSUP64 HSUP67 |
| APAC New Zealand HISF Suppliers 2023 | HSUP64 HSUP67 |
| APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 | 3.4.3 |
Americas (2)
| Framework | Mapping Values |
|---|---|
| Americas Canada CSAG | 4.27 |
| Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 | 03.16.03.C 03.17.02 |
Capability Maturity Model
Level 0 — Not Performed
There is no evidence of a capability to monitor, regularly review and audit Third-Party Service Providers (TSP) for compliance with established contractual requirements for cybersecurity and data protection controls.
Level 1 — Performed Informally
C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to monitor, regularly review and audit Third-Party Service Providers (TSP) for compliance with established contractual requirements for cybersecurity and data protection controls.
Level 2 — Planned & Tracked
Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Require TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Contain "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data protection practices deficiency(ies).
- Third-party management is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
- IT/cybersecurity personnel identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for third-party management.
- A procurement function maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment.
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
- Procurement contracts:
Level 3 — Well Defined
Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to third-party management. o Operates the Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program to identify and mitigate supply chain-related risks and threats. o Evaluates risks associated with weaknesses or deficiencies in supply chain elements identified during first and/ or third-party reviews. o Enables the implementation of third-party management controls. o Ensures the Information Assurance Program (IAP) evaluates applicable cybersecurity and data protection controls as part of “business as usual” pre-production testing. o Maintains a list of all active Third-Party Service Providers (TSP), including pertinent contract information that will assist in a risk assessment. o Requires TSP to follow secure engineering practices as part of a broader Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) initiative. o Includes "break clauses" in all TSP contracts to enable penalty-free, early termination of a contract for cause, based on the TSP's cybersecurity and/ or data protection practices deficiency(ies). o Controls changes to services by suppliers, taking into account the criticality of business information, systems and processes that are in scope by the third-party. o Requires a risk assessment prior to the acquisition or outsourcing of technology-related services. o Monitors, regularly reviews and audits supplier service delivery for compliance with established contract agreements. o Uses tailored acquisition strategies, contract tools and procurement methods for the purchase of unique systems, system components or services.
- Procurement contracts and layered defenses provide safeguards to limit harm from potential adversaries who identify and target the organization's supply chain.
- A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function;
- A procurement team, or similar function:
- A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) is documented for every TSP that directly or indirectly affects sensitive/regulated data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled
Third-Party Management (TPM) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
- Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
- Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
- Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
- Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
- Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving
See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to monitor, regularly review and audit Third-Party Service Providers (TSP) for compliance with established contractual requirements for cybersecurity and data protection controls.
Assessment Objectives
- TPM-08_A01 the frequency at which to assess and review the supply chain-related risks associated with suppliers or contractors and the systems, system components or system services they provide is defined.
- TPM-08_A02 the supply chain-related risks associated with suppliers or contractors and the systems, system components or system services they provide are assessed and reviewed per an organization-defined frequency.
- TPM-08_A03 supply chain elements, processes and actors to be analyzed and tested are defined.
- TPM-08_A04 organization-defined mechanisms are employed on supply chain elements, processes and actors associated with the system, system component or system service.
- TPM-08_A05 processes, methods, and techniques to monitor security requirement compliance by external service providers on an ongoing basis are implemented.
Evidence Requirements
- E-TPM-03 Third-Party Service Reviews
-
Documented evidence of a formal, annual stakeholder review of third-party services for each Third-Party Service Provider (TSP).
Third-Party Management
Technology Recommendations
Micro/Small
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Small
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Medium
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Large
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program
Enterprise
- Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) program