Skip to main content

VPM-04: Continuous Vulnerability Remediation Activities

VPM 8 — High Protect

Mechanisms exist to address new threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis and ensure assets are protected against known attacks.

Control Question: Does the organization address new threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis and ensure assets are protected against known attacks?

General (28)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC4.2
CIS CSC 8.1 12.1 18.3 7 7.7
CIS CSC 8.1 IG1 12.1
CIS CSC 8.1 IG2 7.7 12.1 18.3
CIS CSC 8.1 IG3 7.7 12.1 18.3
COBIT 2019 DSS03.01 DSS03.02 DSS03.03 DSS03.04 DSS03.05 DSS06.04 MEA01.05
COSO 2017 Principle 17
CSA CCM 4 AIS-07 TVM-03
CSA IoT SCF 2 CLS-06 VLN-03
NIST 800-53 R4 SC-18(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) SC-18(1)
NIST 800-53 R5 (NOC) (source) SC-18(1)
NIST 800-171 R2 (source) 3.11.3
NIST 800-171 R3 (source) 03.11.02.b 03.14.01.a 03.14.01.b
NIST 800-171A R3 (source) A.03.11.02.b
OWASP Top 10 2021 A05:2021 A06:2021
PCI DSS 4.0.1 (source) 6.3.3 11.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ A-EP (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ B-IP (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ C-VT (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Merchant (source) 6.3.3
PCI DSS 4.0.1 SAQ D Service Provider (source) 6.3.3
SWIFT CSF 2023 2.7
SCF CORE Mergers, Acquisitions & Divestitures (MA&D) VPM-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 2 Critical Infrastructure VPM-04
SCF CORE ESP Level 3 Advanced Threats VPM-04
US (14)
Framework Mapping Values
US C2M2 2.1 RISK-2.I.MIL3
US CERT RMM 1.2 KIM:SG3.SP2 VAR:SG1.SP2
US CISA CPG 2022 1.E
US CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (source) RA.L2-3.11.3
US DHS CISA TIC 3.0 3.UNI.VMANG
US DHS ZTCF EPM-02
US FCA CRM 609.930(c)(2)
US FFIEC D1.RM.RA.E.1
US HIPAA HICP Large Practice 7.L.B
US IRS 1075 SC-18(1)
US NNPI (unclass) 9.1 17.1
US NSTC NSPM-33 6.11
US - CA CCPA 2025 7123(c)(5)(D)
US - NY DFS 23 NYCRR500 2023 Amd 2 500.5(b)
EMEA (6)
Framework Mapping Values
EMEA EU NIS2 21.4
EMEA Germany C5 2020 OPS-18 PSS-02
EMEA Israel CDMO 1.0 22.6 22.11
EMEA Saudi Arabia CSCC-1 2019 2-9-1-3
EMEA Saudi Arabia ECC-1 2018 2-10-3-3
EMEA Saudi Arabia OTCC-1 2022 2-9-1-2 2-9-1-3
APAC (5)
Framework Mapping Values
APAC Australia ISM June 2024 ISM-1801
APAC Australia Prudential Standard CPS234 21
APAC Japan ISMAP 4.6 4.6.1
APAC New Zealand NZISM 3.6 6.2.6.C.01 23.2.19.C.01
APAC Singapore MAS TRM 2021 13.6.1(a) 13.6.1(b) 13.6.1(c)
Americas (3)
Framework Mapping Values
Americas Canada CSAG 2.7
Americas Canada OSFI B-13 3.2.6
Americas Canada ITSP-10-171 03.11.02.B 03.14.01.A 03.14.01.B

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to address new threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis and ensure assets are protected against known attacks.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to address new threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis and ensure assets are protected against known attacks.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

Vulnerability & Patch Management (VPM) efforts are requirements-driven and governed at a local/regional level, but are not consistent across the organization. CMM Level 2 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Identify cybersecurity and data protection controls to address applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements for ASM. o Apply software patches and other vulnerability remediation efforts.

  • Attack Surface Management (ASM) is decentralized (e.g., a localized/regionalized function) and uses non-standardized methods to implement secure, resilient and compliant practices.
  • IT/cybersecurity personnel:
  • Administrative processes and technologies focus on protecting High Value Assets (HVAs), including environments where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed.
Level 3 — Well Defined

Vulnerability & Patch Management (VPM) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist: o Defines the scope of ASM activities. o Provides governance oversight for the implementation of applicable statutory, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity and data protection controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, availability and safety of the organization's applications, systems, services and data with regards to ASM. o Provides oversight of ASM activities to centrally manage the flaw remediation process as part of the organization's overall Patch& Vulnerability & Patch Management Program (VPMP). o Manages the identification, tracking and remediation of vulnerabilities. o Utilizes a Security Incident Event monitor (SIEM), or similar automated tool, to monitor for unauthorized activities, accounts, connections, devices and software according to organization-specific Indicators of Compromise (IoC), including feeds from applications, hosts, network devices and vulnerability scanners.

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, categorizes devices according to the data the asset stores, transmits and/ or processes and applies the appropriate technology controls to protect the asset and data.
  • A Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) function, or similar function:
  • A Security Operations Center (SOC), or similar function:
  • Asset custodians install the latest stable version of security-related updates on all systems within the organization-defined time requirements.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Vulnerability & Patch Management (VPM) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement. In addition to CMM Level 3 criteria, CMM Level 4 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Vulnerability & Patch Management (VPM) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. VPM-04_A01 sources of new threats and vulnerabilities are defined.
  2. VPM-04_A02 a time period is defined to seek out new, applicable threats and vulnerabilities.
  3. VPM-04_A03 a capability exists to respond to new threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis.
  4. VPM-04_A04 system vulnerabilities are remediated within organization-defined response times.
  5. VPM-04_A05 system vulnerabilities are remediated within <A.03.11.02.ODP[03]: response times>.

Evidence Requirements

E-MNT-03 Patch Management

Documented evidence of maintenance activities for systems, applications and services management (e.g., patch management).

Maintenance
E-THR-05 Threat Mitigation

Documented evidence of steps taken to mitigate identified threats.

Threat Management

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.