Skip to main content

AST-02.11: Component Assignment

AST 3 — Low Identify

Mechanisms exist to bind components to a specific system.

Control Question: Does the organization bind components to a specific system?

General (4)
Framework Mapping Values
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) CM-8(9)
NIST 800-161 R1 CM-8(9)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 CM-8(9)
Shared Assessments SIG 2025 G.3

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to bind components to a specific system.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to bind components to a specific system.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to bind components to a specific system.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
  • An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
  • Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
  • A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
  • Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

See C|P-CMM3. There are no defined C|P-CMM4 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a quantitatively-controlled process is not necessary to bind components to a specific system.

Level 5 — Continuously Improving

See C|P-CMM4. There are no defined C|P-CMM5 criteria, since it is reasonable to assume a continuously-improving process is not necessary to bind components to a specific system.

Assessment Objectives

  1. AST-02.11_A01 personnel or roles from which to receive an acknowledgement is/are defined.
  2. AST-02.11_A02 system components are assigned to a system.
  3. AST-02.11_A03 an acknowledgement of the component assignment is received from organization-defined personnel or roles.

Technology Recommendations

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.