Skip to main content

AST-02.10: Automated Location Tracking

AST 5 — Medium Identify

Mechanisms exist to track the geographic location of system components.

Control Question: Does the organization track the geographic location of system components?

General (5)
Framework Mapping Values
AICPA TSC 2017:2022 (used for SOC 2) (source) CC2.1-POF6 CC2.1-POF9
NIST 800-53 R5 (source) CM-8(8)
NIST 800-161 R1 CM-8(8)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 2 CM-8(8)
NIST 800-161 R1 Level 3 CM-8(8)

Capability Maturity Model

Level 0 — Not Performed

There is no evidence of a capability to track the geographic location of system components.

Level 1 — Performed Informally

C|P-CMM1 is N/A, since a structured process is required to track the geographic location of system components.

Level 2 — Planned & Tracked

C|P-CMM2 is N/A, since a well-defined process is required to track the geographic location of system components.

Level 3 — Well Defined

Asset Management (AST) efforts are standardized across the organization and centrally managed, where technically feasible, to ensure consistency. CMM Level 3 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • An IT Asset Management (ITAM) function, or similar function, governs asset management to help ensure compliance with requirements for asset management.
  • An ITAM function, or similar function, maintains an inventory of IT assets, covering both physical and virtual assets, as well as centrally managed asset ownership assignments.
  • Technology assets and data are categorized according to data classification and business criticality criteria.
  • A Cybersecurity Supply Chain Risk Management (C-SCRM) function oversees supply chain risks including the removal and prevention of certain technology services and/ or equipment designated as supply chain threats by a statutory or regulatory body.
  • Data/process owners document where sensitive/regulated data is stored, transmitted and processed, generating Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) and network diagrams to document the flow of data.
  • ITAM, or a supporting system, has the capability to bind components to a specific IT assets and track the real-time GPS location of the device.
Level 4 — Quantitatively Controlled

Asset Management (AST) efforts are metrics driven and provide sufficient management insight (based on a quantitative understanding of process capabilities) to predict optimal performance, ensure continued operations and identify areas for improvement.

  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs).
  • Metrics reporting includes quantitative analysis of Key Risk Indicators (KRIs).
  • Scope of metrics, KPIs and KRIs covers organization-wide cybersecurity and data protection controls, including functions performed by third-parties.
  • Organizational leadership maintains a formal process to objectively review and respond to metrics, KPIs and KRIs (e.g., monthly or quarterly review).
  • Based on metrics analysis, process improvement recommendations are submitted for review and are handled in accordance with change control processes.
  • Both business and technical stakeholders are involved in reviewing and approving proposed changes.
Level 5 — Continuously Improving

Asset Management (AST) efforts are “world-class” capabilities that leverage predictive analysis (e.g., machine learning, AI, etc.). In addition to CMM Level 4 criteria, CMM Level 5 control maturity would reasonably expect all, or at least most, the following criteria to exist:

  • Stakeholders make time-sensitive decisions to support operational efficiency, which may include automated remediation actions.
  • Based on predictive analysis, process improvements are implemented according to “continuous improvement” practices that affect process changes.

Assessment Objectives

  1. AST-02.10_A01 automated mechanisms for tracking components are defined.
  2. AST-02.10_A02 organization-defined automated mechanisms are used to support the tracking of system components by geographic location.

Technology Recommendations

Micro/Small

  • Prey (https://preyproject.com)

Small

  • Prey (https://preyproject.com)

Medium

  • Prey (https://preyproject.com)

Large

  • Prey (https://preyproject.com)

Enterprise

  • Prey (https://preyproject.com)

The Secure Controls Framework (SCF) is maintained by SCF Council. Use of SCF content is subject to the SCF Terms & Conditions.

Manage this control in SCF Connect

Track implementation status, collect evidence, and map controls to your compliance frameworks automatically.